国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

It's a matter of privilege

By Mao Shoulong (China Daily) Updated: 2014-07-28 20:37

But the public sees this subsidy as another salary rise for civil servants, because employees in other industries don't have such vehicle subsidies. Ordinary people have to pay for the purchase and maintenance of their car themselves. Generally speaking, any commuter has to pay for his or her own transport expenses. If there's a business need for transportation, government vehicles should be arranged according to work requirements rather than rank. Any transportation subsidy distributed according to administrative rank is regarded as a privileged subsidy. For the public, it's unreasonable to raise civil servants' salaries in this way.

Therefore, it is still a compromised solution between the government and the public. The government wants to control the increase in expenditure on government vehicles while the public wants to eliminate the privilege they believe government employees enjoy. It's impossible for the government to completely eliminate government vehicles, because they are necessary for work. But experience has shown that only providing government vehicles for work instead of providing subsidies to officials will fail to curb the out-of-control situation regarding the quantity and use of government vehicles.

Therefore, the internal problem remains unsolved in government vehicle reform: The public wants the privilege of government vehicles according to administrative rank completely eliminated and the use of government vehicles determined by work requirements, but the authorities are unable to both abolish privilege and control the amount and use of government vehicles.

The public is intolerant of government's compromised choice, while the solution that the public supports is unacceptable to the government. Thus the authorities can only compromise and lower the transport subsidies.

Therefore, the current reform plan is a compromise between the ideal and reality. To fundamentally solve the problem, the authorities should arrange government vehicles based on work demands rather than on rank. And to control the use of government vehicles, we should focus more on the decision-making, implementation and supervision system and mechanism of public fiscal expenditure, in other words, curb the power. If we can't curb the power and achieve modernization of the national governance system, we cannot get rid of the current system of providing subsidies according to rank.

The author is a professor of public administration at Renmin University of China.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

...
九龙坡区| 十堰市| 肥城市| 裕民县| 内丘县| 策勒县| 车致| 磴口县| 新宾| 凤庆县| 酒泉市| 大邑县| 平度市| 临猗县| 山东| 安顺市| 平果县| 龙海市| 新乐市| 保山市| 来凤县| 辽宁省| 麟游县| 孟州市| 石林| 苍溪县| 义乌市| 维西| 苍梧县| 泰兴市| 留坝县| 温州市| 镇坪县| 余江县| 岚皋县| 诸暨市| 延川县| 如东县| 布拖县| 体育| 安溪县|