国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

So-called referendum deceptive and dangerous

By Song Sio-Chong (China Daily) Updated: 2014-06-25 07:10

The "Occupy Central" campaign supporters have asked the Hong Kong public to select from three proposals, each of which includes an element of civil nomination for the Chief Executive in the 2017 election. This is a deceptive tactic - undemocratically decided upon - by the civil disobedience movement. They also plan to lead a massive occupation of Central to paralyze the financial heart of the city. The organizers believe this will make the central government bend to local pressure.

They must be dreaming if they think the central government, which has made the "One Country Two Systems" policy such a success, will give in to an unlawful movement. The One Country, Two Systems policy and the arrangements for universal suffrage outlined in the Basic Law are legitimate and justified. So any movement opposing them has to be illegitimate and unjustified.

More people now believe the movement is acting in a contemptible and ruthless way by attempting to seduce an uninformed public - particularly young people. Whatever its organizers say, the campaign will result in significant economic damage to Hong Kong. It may possibly lead to serious social unrest - even acts of terrorism.

One aspect of the movement is a referendum conducted by electronic voting. But this has no legal basis in Hong Kong and, in fact, contravenes the Basic Law.

Article 12 of the Basic Law clearly states Hong Kong is a local administrative region directly under the central government. This means that the People's Republic of China is a unitary state and no region has individual sovereignty. The exercise of such a referendum is an expression of such sovereignty. It is interesting to note that in the French constitution - and France is also a unitary state - local regions are prohibited from expressing sovereignty through referendums.

The content of the so-called referendum is also problematic. According to Article 45(2) of the Basic Law, the nomination of the Chief Executive candidates is the responsibility of the Nominating Committee. Other than the Nominating Committee no nomination body or system is allowed to undertake this function. This, therefore, rules out civil nomination.

Article 11(1) of the Basic Law also stipulates that electoral systems practiced in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region must be based on all the provisions of this law. So civil nomination clearly violates the Basic Law.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

...
苍南县| 穆棱市| 建湖县| 太湖县| 鄂伦春自治旗| 丰都县| 宝丰县| 辽宁省| 台湾省| 自贡市| 平湖市| 英超| 乐亭县| 龙陵县| 无为县| 两当县| 安福县| 通渭县| 横峰县| 靖远县| 渑池县| 伽师县| 河南省| 桃园县| 岱山县| 八宿县| 扎赉特旗| 荥经县| 顺平县| 麻城市| 金昌市| 明水县| 龙川县| 和政县| 营口市| 泸溪县| 新竹市| 荥阳市| 神木县| 科技| 汝州市|