国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

The US as a global risk generator

By Kevin P. Gallagher | China Daily | Updated: 2013-07-01 09:27

However, when the last financial crisis hit there was such a flight of capital out of emerging markets and back into the US that many of those positions were rapidly unwound - to the great detriment of those economies. Such are the massive - and global - transmission effects of today's tightly integrated financial markets.

Never relenting, these same FX derivatives market operators got very busy again right in the wake of the global financial crisis. Hedge funds and big banks engaged in the carry trade. They borrowed in US dollars at very low interest rates and then invested in foreign currencies in a broad range of countries, from the ROK, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico to South Africa, Indonesia and Thailand. Financial professionals, that as those running hedge funds and banks are, then built FX derivatives that shorted the dollar and went long on those currencies.

This fueled exchange rate appreciation and created asset bubbles that are part of the reason for the slowdown in emerging markets. Now that the Fed is looking to wind down its easing policies, capital is fleeing emerging markets again, causing exchange rates to depreciate and debt burdens to rise.

By now, it is a familiar story. Financial engineering, largely by US-owned companies, generates serious blowback in the real economy - and hurt themselves too in the process. Citigroup, a too-big-to-fail bank, may lose up to $7 billion in FX derivatives markets if the dollar appreciates as capital flies back to the US.

The next regulatory blow may hit any day. The CFTC and the SEC are now considering exempting the same foreign subsidiaries and branches of hedge funds and big banks headquartered or with stakes in the US that have been packaging derivatives overseas.

This would be disastrous for emerging markets and developing countries attempting to maintain financial stability for development. To their credit, the ROK and Brazil both have put in place their own regulations on FX derivatives, but emerging markets alone cannot carry the burden of regulating a $4 trillion-per-day market.

Gensler has said that, if these regulations are swapped out of rule making, hedge funds can evade the rules "by setting up shop in an offshore locale, even if it's not much more than a tropical island P.O. Box." Gensler needs a majority of commissioners to help him plug this loophole by July 12. Time is running out. The world cannot afford to create major loopholes that could threaten the global financial system yet again.

The author is co-director of Boston University's Global Economic Governance Initiative and co-chair of the Pardee Task Force For Regulating Global Capital Flows and Development, and a regular contributor to The Globalist.

The Globalist

Previous 1 2 Next

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
延长县| 西和县| 阿拉尔市| 泊头市| 清涧县| 平舆县| 浦江县| 乌鲁木齐县| 石台县| 社会| 施甸县| 吉安市| 无极县| 天峨县| 嘉定区| 镇坪县| 奉化市| 鲁甸县| 如皋市| 巫山县| 山阴县| 汕尾市| 白沙| 柘荣县| 洛川县| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 方正县| 防城港市| 固安县| 虞城县| 三原县| 调兵山市| 翁源县| 中卫市| 普兰店市| 竹山县| 萨嘎县| 卢龙县| 苏州市| 安乡县| 重庆市|