国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Comment

Returning looted artifacts a moral imperative

China Daily | Updated: 2026-04-17 00:00
Share
Share - WeChat

The French National Assembly recently passed a bill simplifying the restitution procedure for artworks looted from 1815 to 1972. It represents a noticeable step in the global movement to return cultural artifacts to their countries of origin.

In the grand tapestry of history, cultural artifacts are the threads that weave together the identity and heritage of a nation. When these threads are torn away, the fabric of a culture is left frayed and diminished. The passage of this bill is a recognition of a moral imperative, a necessary step toward rectifying historical injustices and restoring cultural heritage to its rightful owners.

For China it is welcome news as the Chinese Museum inside the Palace of Fontainebleau alone reportedly houses over 1,000 Chinese artifacts, looted when French and British soldiers ransacked the Old Summer Palace, Yuanmingyuan Park, in Beijing.

The restitution of looted artifacts is a complex issue, deeply intertwined with the legacy of colonialism and the limitations of the current international legal framework. The UNESCO Convention of 1970 and the UNIDROIT Convention of 1995 provide the primary legal bases for pursuing the return of cultural relics. However, these conventions apply only to artifacts stolen or illegally exported after they came into force and are confined to their signing parties, leaving a significant gap in addressing the vast number of relics looted during earlier periods, particularly those taken through war, plunder or coercion.

This legal void has often left countries of origin without sufficient grounds to reclaim their cultural heritage, placing the decision to return artifacts largely at the discretion of the possessing nations. In recent years, there has been a growing ethical consensus that artifacts looted during war or colonial rule should be returned to their countries of origin. This shift in moral perspective is part of a broader wave to redress the historical injustices of colonization that extends beyond the political and economic realms into the cultural and museum sectors. In this context, France's new bill emerges as a beacon of hope.

Several countries have already taken steps in this direction. Germany has restituted colonial-era artifacts to Nigeria and Tanzania, while the Netherlands has returned hundreds of colonial-era artifacts to Indonesia, Sri Lanka and other countries. Italy has also taken moves, restituting hundreds of pieces of art and artifacts to China in recent years.

At its core, the restitution of cultural relics is about the restoration of history, respect for cultural heritage and diversity of all nations, and a bridge toward rebuilding trust and achieving reconciliation between countries. By returning looted artifacts, nations demonstrate their recognition of the deep cultural and historical ties that artifacts hold for their communities of origin and their commitment to justice, equity and the principles of international law.

Countries that still hold large quantities of looted artifacts should squarely face their historical accountability and follow France's positive example to respond earnestly to the just demands of the peoples of the countries of origin.

Hopefully, France's initiative will become a new starting point for the global movement to return stolen cultural relics, and that more countries holding looted artifacts will keep pace with the times. Enabling more displaced cultural relics to return home as soon as possible will allow different civilizations to achieve better understanding of each other through respect for history and mutual tolerance.

China has already made notable progress in reclaiming stolen cultural relics in recent years. Through combining legal action and diplomatic negotiation, the country has seen 35 batches comprising 537 pieces of Chinese cultural relics and artworks returned home during the 14th Five-Year Plan period (2021-25) alone.

The repatriation of cultural relics remains challenging worldwide. That underscores the urgent need for international cooperation to protect cultural heritage. Preserving cultural relics is not merely about safeguarding a nation's history but about human civilization as a whole.

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
吐鲁番市| 陆河县| 新营市| 将乐县| 上杭县| 确山县| 宣恩县| 邵阳市| 钟山县| 蓬安县| 合山市| 蕲春县| 天长市| 阿拉善左旗| 皋兰县| 西昌市| 唐河县| 浦江县| 兴安盟| 潼关县| 增城市| 张家港市| 射阳县| 大石桥市| 灵寿县| 凤冈县| 嘉善县| 日喀则市| 嘉鱼县| 延寿县| 邛崃市| 台安县| 陆良县| 丰城市| 永昌县| 巢湖市| 米易县| 黄大仙区| 仁化县| 天峻县| 绩溪县|