国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / World Watch

West ignores its own past in stance on trial of Lai

By Tom Fowdy | China Daily Global | Updated: 2023-12-21 09:20
Share
Share - WeChat
Photo taken on July 14, 2020 shows the Golden Bauhinia Square in Hong Kong. [Photo/Xinhua]

Monday marked the beginning of the national security trial of Jimmy Lai Chee-ying, the former Hong Kong media tycoon and founder of the now-defunct Apple Daily, who is charged with foreign collusion and could face up to life in prison.

Naturally, the mainstream Western media have responded by framing him in the language of a "pro-democracy" campaigner and depicting the situation as an act of state persecution against the freedom of Hong Kong. However, this is a willful and deliberate misinterpretation of the facts.

First of all, we might ask ourselves whether it would be tolerable for an influential media mogul in Britain or the United States to collaborate, as Lai is accused of doing, with the highest-level leadership of a hostile power to foment an agenda of creating political change? It might be added that in Western countries, people are often prosecuted for collusion on far less of a premise.

As a wealthy and influential dissident figure in Hong Kong, Lai actively and publicly engaged with the highest levels of the administration of former US president Donald Trump and was seen as a conduit for US foreign policy goals, which was encouraged by many senior US politicians as a means of getting at China.

Lai met with then US national security adviser John Bolton, then secretary of state Mike Pompeo and then vice-president Mike Pence, with the apparent goal of encouraging US intervention in the Hong Kong issue, which logically would represent a direct threat to China's sovereign interests.

We might ask ourselves again, would the US tolerate independence activists from Hawaii or Puerto Rico, or other state or territory, meeting with foreign leaders to further their agenda to undermine Washington's rule? Why would this be acceptable in Hong Kong just because it is under the banner of "freedom and democracy"?

In addition, Lai is accused of being a ringleader in one of the biggest periods of unrest, disorder and violence that the city of Hong Kong has ever seen. It is again without question that no other state on Earth would tolerate riots on such a scale with the view to sustaining total insurrection against the state.

We can visit other examples. The United Kingdom has increasingly hardened its laws on the prosecution and jailing of violent activists. For example, a large number of Just Stop Oil and other climate activists have been imprisoned for paralyzing public infrastructure or other forms of disorder and vandalism.

In other Western countries, in particular the US, police have no qualms about even using force to suppress disruptive protests. We might add that the punishment for those who led the insurrection at the US Capitol in 2021 was also very harsh. Why should this be acceptable in Hong Kong, if not at home?

Given this, there is nothing unacceptable about the National Security Law for Hong Kong and its application to suppress foreign-backed insurrection that reduced the city to a state of chaos in 2019.Western countries are attempting to deprive China of its sovereign rights, in its own lawful territory, as a pretext to advancing their own ideological goals.

The Basic Law of Hong Kong has long mandated the inclusion of a national security law. More to the point, the designated autonomy of Hong Kong has never been extended to matters of high sovereignty, foreign policy, national security or defense.

The city is a better place after the insurrection was ended, and we should not pretend that 150 years of British rule made the city a beacon of freedom or democracy, where people were free to pursue large-scale destruction and violence in the pursuit of political goals.

The author is a British political and international relations analyst.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
佛坪县| 岳普湖县| 井冈山市| 出国| 突泉县| 延寿县| 连云港市| 吉林市| 西丰县| 车险| 泾川县| 丹棱县| 保靖县| 宜兴市| 娱乐| 双桥区| 涟水县| 萨迦县| 古丈县| 海兴县| 彭阳县| 宝丰县| 凤城市| 三原县| 五河县| 共和县| 昌乐县| 聂荣县| 金门县| 玉门市| 建平县| 宣恩县| 历史| 株洲县| 桃园县| 濮阳县| 绥德县| 汾阳市| 邹平县| 白玉县| 新乐市|