国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Americas

US politics seen behind visit by Pelosi

By HENG WEILI in New York | China Daily Global | Updated: 2022-08-04 11:12
Share
Share - WeChat
Thunderstorm clouds roll over the US Capitol on July 25, 2022 in Washington, DC. [Photo/Agencies]

US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's now-completed trip to Taiwan was driven by both American domestic politics and a history of foreign meddling, said observers of the contentious visit.

David Stockman, a former US congressman and budget director during the Reagan administration of the 1980s, said the visit had "everything to do with US domestic politics and nothing whatsoever to do with the safety, security and liberty of the American homeland".

"At least now the stupidity of the whole affair has been made starkly evident by Nancy Pelosi's utterly reckless election-season gambit. Her trip had no other purpose than to bolster the Dems' flagging prospects come November," he wrote in a piece on antiwar.com Wednesday.

Stockman said that without Washington's "constant diplomatic support and weapons sales, leaders of Taiwan would have eventually recognized the handwriting on the wall and made some kind of affiliation arrangements with Beijing".

Washington policymakers did not "lose" China in 1949 "because it was never theirs to lose. Nor did America's security ever depend upon the decades of domestic political machinations over the status of the Chinese province of Taiwan," he wrote.

"I think a lot of it is trying to burnish her legacy," David Sacks, Council on Foreign Relations research fellow, told Yahoo Finance Live of Pelosi's visit. "You know if the polling that we see is correct, she won't remain the speaker after the midterm elections."

Australian journalist Caitlin Johnstone last week decried what she saw as bipartisan support for Pelosi's trip.

"In reality, though Democrats tend to lean more toward supporting aggressions against Russia while Republicans lean more toward favoring aggressions against China, they're both just manufacturing consent for the same unipolarist agenda of total global domination," Johnstone wrote on her website.

"They pretend to be on opposing sides, but if you ignore the narratives and just look at the actions, what you see is a steadily escalating 'great power competition' designed to facilitate the US empire's longstanding agenda of securing unipolar planetary hegemony at all cost.

Underlining that point, 26 Republican senators sent a letter supporting the Democrat Pelosi's excursion.

"We support Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi's trip to Taiwan. For decades, members of the United States Congress, including previous Speakers of the House, have traveled to Taiwan," the statement signed by Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell reads.

"The drums of war are growing louder and louder, and the psychopaths who feed off it are growing more and more aroused," Johnstone wrote.

Former US ambassador to China Max Baucus told CNN: "My view, frankly, is that she should not have gone. The goal of US foreign policy is to reduce tensions with China, not increase tensions. Her visit clearly is increasing tensions. There (was) no foreign policy reason for her to go."

Tom Watkins, president and CEO of TDW and Associates, a business and education consultant in the US, told China Daily now that Pelosi has departed Taiwan, "the world nervously awaits what China's rolling response will entail".

"Her visit was a clear strategic provocation. Few believe her departure marks the end of a burgeoning crisis.

"The fear that must be in the front of all rational minds is that the fast-moving situation could lead to an accidental encounter that could spin out of control. With the tension and low trust between the US and China, the potential of a miscommunication or 'accident' could lead to irreversible consequences," Watkins said.

The United Nations on Wednesday reiterated its support for the one-China principle, noting that it follows UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 2758 of 1971.

"Our position is very clear. We abide by General Assembly resolutions, by the one-China policy, and that is the orientation that we have in everything we do," UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said.

On Oct 25, 1971, the UNGA passed the resolution recognizing the government of the People's Republic of China (PRC) as the only lawful representative of China to the UN.

Minlu Zhang in New York contributed to this story.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
和田市| 白沙| 九寨沟县| 北宁市| 鹤岗市| 芮城县| 若羌县| 霍城县| 海口市| 平度市| 余江县| 宝坻区| 察雅县| 安阳市| 朝阳市| 周至县| 滕州市| 卢龙县| 墨竹工卡县| 彭山县| 阜阳市| 宁强县| 邵阳市| 新巴尔虎左旗| 上饶市| 原平市| 象州县| 绍兴县| 个旧市| 梅河口市| 高雄市| 桐庐县| 东方市| 沁水县| 北碚区| 西城区| 潢川县| 哈密市| 辽阳县| 阳新县| 定结县|