国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
HongKong Comment(1)

Industrial building revitalization scheme must offer more incentives

HK Edition | Updated: 2017-10-20 06:12
Share
Share - WeChat

In Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor's first Policy Address she clearly said "the government is exploring different approaches to facilitate the transformation of industrial buildings and releasing land resources. Possible options include reactivating the revitalization scheme for industrial buildings by offering incentives to encourage owners of old industrial buildings to undertake redevelopment or wholesale conversion, and considering how operating space can be provided legally and safely under the scheme for certain industries with development potential, such as cultural, arts and creative industries, and for appropriate community facilities."

In April 2010, a set of measures to facilitate redevelopment and wholesale conversion of older industrial buildings introduced by the special administrative region government came into effect, and the scheme lasted six years before it came to an end in March last year. The revitalization scheme received 248 applications of which 125 were approved.

Both numbers of applications and approvals seem minor when compared with the 1,400 industrial buildings in Hong Kong. Therefore the CE is searching for new ideas in dealing with old industrial buildings so as to release the 2,000 hectares of land resources with matching facilities currently occupied by these 1,400 buildings. If these land resources are redeployed or reconstructed according to the comprehensive development scheme for the community, they are the perfect solution to the city's land and housing shortage as well as for upgrading the whole structure of town planning.

As a first-hand applicant for revitalization measures, I fully understand the immediate concerns of old industrial building owners - there are simply not enough incentives for owners to apply for wholesale conversion, even with the threshold of "compulsory sale" having been lowered to 80 percent. From the point of view of landlords, most of the plot ratios of industrial buildings are already used up and these buildings are still restricted to industrial use after reconstruction, so it's simply a waste of time and resources to apply for revitalization.

In this case, I believe the matter of prime importance is to relax the restriction of "industrial use". The definition of "industrial use" adopted by the Lands Department follows the definition of "factory" under the Factories and Industrial Undertakings Ordinance enacted in the 1960s. The narrow definition has, to a great extent, restricted the use of industrial buildings and even led to the illegal use of them.

When calculating the vacancy rate of industrial buildings, the government would include illegal usage such as subdivided units, art-design-music studios, private home kitchens, mini storehouses, fish farms and even barbecue venues. By including this illegal usage, the authorities tend to draw a conclusion that the vacancy rate of industrial buildings is low, at 5 to 6 percent. But the figure is misleading because the legitimate usage that fits the "industrial use" description only takes up a small proportion of space in these buildings.

Why is irregular/illegal usage so common in Hong Kong? I believe the main reason is about market value. The old industrial buildings are restricted to industry-related activities only, including manufacturing, altering, cleansing, repairing, ornamenting, finishing, adapting for sale, breaking up or demolishing or transforming materials. In other words, eligible tenants are rare on the market; returns on rental therefore cannot reflect the actual value of the buildings. This is why many owners would take the risk of violating the law and rent space to ineligible tenants.

The definition of "industrial use", as promulgated by the Town Planning Board, has been extended to activities such as training, research, design and development, quality control and packaging in relation to industrial activities. But to achieve a successful re-launch of the revitalization scheme, all government departments need to unify their definitions of "industrial use" and even relax the restriction to a greater extent, so as to provide more incentives for industrial building owners to make the best use of land plots occupied by their industrial buildings, and help relieve the city's problem of land shortages.

(HK Edition 10/20/2017 page8)

 

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
韩城市| 育儿| 屏南县| 平和县| 长海县| 广西| 三台县| 栾川县| 铁岭市| 泾川县| 项城市| 抚远县| 甘谷县| 安福县| 莫力| 梅州市| 大同县| 柳江县| 淮安市| 南部县| 奈曼旗| 邵阳市| 古浪县| 安平县| 遂平县| 工布江达县| 当雄县| 霸州市| 修水县| 翁源县| 永平县| 台东市| 满洲里市| 竹溪县| 长宁县| 玉门市| 海淀区| 吉林省| 汤原县| 洞头县| 崇明县|