国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

How to supervise the anti-graft watchdogs

By Zhang Lin | China Daily | Updated: 2017-01-13 07:51

How to supervise the anti-graft watchdogs

A gavel in a court. [Photo/IC]

As an important part of the Communist Party of China's campaign for stricter self-governance, the Party's disciplinary officials, or anti-graft watchdogs, undertake the mission of "supervision, discipline enforcement and holding violators accountable", and thus play a decisive role in the Party's fight against corruption and drive toward clean governance.

But supervision of the anti-graft watchdogs has long been a difficult issue.

At the just-concluded annual plenary meeting of the top anti-graft watchdog-the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection of the Communist Party of China-Party chief Xi Jinping said disciplinary commissions at various levels should strengthen self-supervision and voluntarily put themselves under intra-Party supervision and social supervision, as part of the efforts to build a team of disciplinary officials that can win the confidence of the Party and the people. Xi's remarks should resolve the anti-graft watchdog supervision issue.

All disciplinary officials have to strengthen self-supervision, in order to build a first and critical line of defense against corruption and decadence. A team of trustworthy disciplinary officials cannot be built by relying on external supervision alone; stricter self-supervision and "supervision of supervisors" are also needed for that.

The building of such a team requires anti-graft watchdogs to continuously educate themselves about disciplinary rules, raise their awareness of the rule of law and learn to handle all cases in strict accordance to the law. Also required is stricter supervision of discipline enforcement by anti-graft watchdogs at the central, provincial and municipal levels.

Moreover, continuous efforts must be made to promote organizational and institutional innovations in the field of discipline inspection, and to deepen the discipline inspection system reform to ensure that the power of supervising discipline enforcement is used in a standardized and orderly manner.

Anti-graft watchdogs must put themselves under intra-Party supervision-which means supervision of various levels of leading Party organs and officials by various Party organizations and the massive number of Party members.

To help build a trustworthy team of anti-graft watchdogs, every disciplinary official must also take part in the Party's organizational meetings and collective activities organized by the Party branch or group he/she belongs to, and voluntarily put himself/herself under its supervision. The weapon of criticism and self-criticism must be well utilized to make all disciplinary officials realize their problems and strictly adhere to the rules. And the work of discipline inspection commissions must be regularly published in the form of bulletins, notifications and reports, and public opinion polls regularly conducted to assess their work in a timely manner.

Disciplinary officials should also put themselves under social supervision, that is, under the supervision of the people and social organizations, because aside from stricter self-supervision and intra-Party supervision, social supervision is also needed to build a team of trustworthy disciplinary officials. For example, hotline mailboxes can be set up for informants to expand the channels for whistle-blowers to reveal the names of disciplinary officials suspected of violating the law and Party discipline.

Besides, different types of activities can be organized with participants from different walks of life to solicit the opinions of people's political consultative conferences, democratic parties and social groups on disciplinary officials' work. The anti-graft watchdogs must also raise their capability of dealing with the media and publicize their discipline inspection work through media outlets to subject their work to journalists' scrutiny and better regulate discipline enforcement activities.

Hopefully, discipline watchdogs at different levels will better combine self-supervision, intra-Party supervision and social supervision and help build a team of disciplinary officials that can win the trust of the Party and the people.

The author is an assistant research fellow on political civilization studies at Beijing Union University.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
宝鸡市| 桃江县| 汨罗市| 宁阳县| 延寿县| 静海县| 荃湾区| 邛崃市| 潜山县| 青铜峡市| 陕西省| 桂东县| 新余市| 沽源县| 岳池县| 乾安县| 西昌市| 盱眙县| 宜良县| 满洲里市| 宁强县| 仪征市| 澄江县| 镇赉县| 永川市| 沂源县| 仁布县| 双鸭山市| 安龙县| 太原市| 马鞍山市| 陆良县| 鹿泉市| 浦城县| 宁南县| 延庆县| 金山区| 横峰县| 四川省| 达孜县| 贺兰县|