国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Heavier penalties will remind firms to meet eco-standards

China Daily | Updated: 2017-01-06 07:52

Heavier penalties will remind firms to meet eco­standards

A tank vehicle loading 26 tons of hydrochloric acid rolled over in Nanxiong city in South China's Guangdong province on April 15, 2012. [Photo/CFP]

Dystar Group, a German company purchased by the domestic company Longshen in 2010, was recently found responsible for discharging 698 tons of waste acid into a canal without proper treatment by Yangzhou Intermediate People's Court. China Youth Daily comments:

According to reports, the court found the average concentration of the waste acid discharged by DyStar was 59 percent, hundreds of times higher than the legal standard. The waste acid has already caused serious pollution and several neighboring tap water plants have had to suspend production.

The company did not start its illegal deeds until a Chinese management took charge. When the chief manager was a German, the company always neutralized its waste acid then sent it to sewage plants for further processing. It was the new Chinese managers who decided to lower the costs and hand over the waste to an unqualified company which then reassigned the project to a third party, leading to the eventual illicit discharge of the waste acid directly into the canal. It seems many of our compatriots have not formed the habit of strictly following legal standards yet.

Reports show that the German manager spent about 3,000 yuan ($433) to process each ton of waste acid. Under the direction of the Chinese chief manager, DyStar disposed at least 2,698 tons of waste acid at the cost of 580 yuan a ton, saving 6.5 million yuan or so.

The damage done by its illegal deeds are beyond measurement, but the punishments for crimes related to environmental pollution are rather light in this country. The court only fined DyStar 20 million yuan, which is hardly enough to prevent it from committing similar misdeeds again, and certainly far from enough to mend the environmental damage it has already done.

The news reports did not mention whether the court found any individual, such as the chief manager, guilty. But it mentioned that he commanded his subordinate staff to cover up any evidence of the discharging of the waste and destroying the evidence in a bid to escape punishment.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
彰化县| 临颍县| 大埔县| 清水县| 永年县| 专栏| 油尖旺区| 吉木萨尔县| 五莲县| 龙井市| 义乌市| 三河市| 沙湾县| 石首市| 扬中市| 佛坪县| 临武县| 萝北县| 墨脱县| 新建县| 托克逊县| 叙永县| 尤溪县| 天津市| 赫章县| 九江县| 米脂县| 南京市| 青河县| 兴国县| 永善县| 呼玛县| 剑阁县| 司法| 慈利县| 河东区| 沂源县| 砚山县| 凉城县| 上蔡县| 榕江县|