国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

Nine proves for 1,000 yuan

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2013-02-05 20:49

It is reported that a worker in a dental clinic in Shenyang city, the capital of Liaoning province, turned to labor arbitration to get her back wages, which were about 1,000 yuan ($160). But, she was informed that nine documents of proof are needed before arbitration officials can create a file for her, and the staff there even told her to "be prepared since it may take several months to finish the whole process without a certainty of getting her money back." It is a shame that our society cannot protect workers' rights in a timely manner, says an editorial in Beijing News. Excerpts:

To seek back wages of 1,000 yuan, nine documents of proof are required, a task that is complicated and difficult for a common worker, not to mention migrant workers.

Labor arbitration is a kind of quasi-judicial procedure, so it is right to require some evidence. However, nine documents of proof is a lot for a common worker asking for back pay.

Moreover, the reason many migrant workers have back-pay issues is that they don't know how to protect themselves. They might not sign a legal labor contract with their employers or keep related evidence of their working statuses, and some bosses use these as excuses to deny wages. Therefore, it is unreasonable to ask workers to submit so much proof — an obstacle for them to get their back pay.

What happened in the labor arbitration organization is not merely a simple case of bad service. It is dereliction of duty. The proof needed in the arbitration law includes timecards and payroll lists, which are all quite difficult for migrant workers to get. Therefore, when dealing with cases involving migrant workers and other vulnerable groups, the labor arbitration organization should actively contact the employers to get proof, rather than requiring the workers to submit the proof for them.

We should blame not only the bad behavior of bosses for the problem with migrant workers' back pay. Dereliction of duty in government sectors should be investigated as well. Take the case in Shenyang, for example. There are three local government organizations responsible for this issue. But none is working actively to help workers.

Maybe it is time to change their behavior first, and then it will be possible to solve the problem with back wages.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
武清区| 临朐县| 金塔县| 阳曲县| 秦皇岛市| 侯马市| 新乐市| 和政县| 昂仁县| 昭平县| 汝阳县| 乌拉特后旗| 邵东县| 沛县| 江华| 龙川县| 洞头县| 巍山| 荣昌县| 宝丰县| 社会| 资中县| 沭阳县| 江川县| 霍邱县| 水富县| 庆元县| 留坝县| 金华市| 雅江县| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 涿州市| 常德市| 宁晋县| 获嘉县| 和田县| 建德市| 贺州市| 山阳县| 曲沃县| 文登市|