Judicial Transparency of Chinese Courts
Conclusion
Judicial transparency is a strength and a sense of confidence. In recent years, as the people’s courts keep increasing input and efforts in judicial transparency, judicial transparency has obtained great progress in form and substance and a new breakthrough, especially in terms of promoting judicial transparency by information-based approaches. It is deeply rooted in people’s mind that disclosure can bring justice, anticorruption and creditability. An open, dynamic, transparent and convenient sunshine judicial mechanism was proposed as a concept and target on the Plenary Session of the 4th Central Committee of the Communist Party, and has become the direction of the judicial transparency work of people’s courts in the new era, and put forward higher requirements for people’s courts in judicial transparency. Judicial transparency is always on the way and never ends. In the near future, the Supreme People’s Court will continue to thoroughly deepen judicial transparency and rely on information technologies to promote the judicial transparency in case registration, court trial, enforcement, hearing, documents and instruments and administrative affairs concerning the court, push forward the full disclosure of judicial basis, process, procedures, results and effective legal documents and instruments, propel the integration, technical innovation, in-depth application and overall advancement of the judicial transparency platforms, accelerate the standardization, institutionalization and informization, and constantly improve the disclosure mechanism, expand disclosure channels, innovate disclosure approaches and construct an open, dynamic, transparent and convenient sunshine judicial transparency, so as to make greater contribution to the full promotion of the rule of law, the construction of a socialist country under the rule of law and the realization of the China Dream of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
(In the event of any inconsistency between the Chinese and English versions, the Chinese version shall prevail.)
