国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Reports

The Evaluation of Officials’ Performance in the New Era: Challenges and Countermeasures (No.20, 2019)

2019-04-09

By Li Yaokun & Hu Xiao, Research Team on “The Target Requirement and Strategic Issues on High-Quality Development”, DRC

Research Report, No.20, 2019 (Total 5520) 2019-2-26

Abstract: Since reform and opening up, China's evaluation work relating to officials' performance has gradually shifted its focus from the GDP-oriented results to the scientific development-based appraisal that gives preference to quality, benefits and sustainability. The evaluation used to lay stress on the performance of officials, including leading members at various levels on an annual basis, while now a systematic evaluation system is targeted at the fulfillment of their duties and job performance in light of their respective office positions in a more scientific and precise manner. As China's social and economic growth is now focused on high-quality-oriented development, the existing evaluation system is facing some prominent problems such as the mismatch between performance standard and development concepts in the new era, the inadequacy between evaluation content and evaluation standards that fail to meet the requirements of high-quality-oriented development, the lack of scientific and efficient evaluation procedures and methods, and the insufficient mechanism that is not in step with giving incentives and allowing for and addressing mistakes. To further promote the evaluation of officials’ performance in the new era, the following suggestions are made. First, the high-quality development needs to be given more expression in the evaluation of officials’ performance. Second, the administrative management system reform needs to shore up the evaluation of officials’ performance. Third, the performance evaluation management system and organization structure need to be fleshed out. Fourth, relevant implementation standards and technological support need to be strengthened. Fifth, the evaluation results need to be tailored to the incentive mechanisms to motivate officials to fulfill their duties.

Key words: evaluation of officials’ performance, high-quality development, new development concepts

 
庐江县| 定西市| 奎屯市| 罗甸县| 田东县| 淮北市| 台北市| 翁源县| 商都县| 武定县| 泰宁县| 台湾省| 东乡县| 米泉市| 霍邱县| 延长县| 九江县| 临沧市| 佳木斯市| 天津市| 蓬安县| 凤城市| 彭山县| 邯郸市| 枣庄市| 遵义市| 河津市| 沂源县| 米易县| 华池县| 安泽县| 永丰县| 郁南县| 太白县| 晋州市| 太湖县| 佛冈县| 宣汉县| 合阳县| 竹北市| 奈曼旗|