国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Publications> Articles

The Reform of Heating Metering Should Not Be Deadlocked

2017-01-18

 

By Zhou Hongchun, DRC

2016-12-02

The principle of heating metering is that those who consume heating should pay the fees and those who consume more heating should pay more and the purpose is to improve energy utilization efficiency. First, the reform of heating metering is constrained by hot-attribution and development stage. Due to the conductivity of heat, the structure and age of buildings and other factors, the progress of heating metering reform is quite slow, which adds difficulties to the fairness of collecting fees by metering. Problems such as ways for heating metering and the collection of heating fees remain to be addressed. Besides, the number of households who have not paid heating fees according to metering devices is high. Second, the implementation of household heating metering system is unsatisfactory. Hardware facilities such as metering devices cannot meet the needs of household heating metering; competent authorities of various levels have not received the assignments relating to fees collection according to heating consumption amount; residents do not respond positively to the effectiveness of the present charge system of heating metering. As a result, a number of heating metering devices are left unused, investment gets no returns, and the potential of energy-saving and emission reduction cannot be given full play. Third, some policy options for pushing forward the reform of heating metering are given as follows. 1. Effectiveness of heating metering reform should be accurately evaluated. Although residents may be urged to save energy by heating metering, metering itself does not produce any energy-saving effect. 2. Household heating metering charge policies should be tailored to local conditions and amendments should be made toward controversial regulations. 3. Policy measures including taxation, loan, fund and credibility should be improved. 4. The leading role of government should be given full play. 5. Energy-saving awareness of residents should be enhanced.

 

For more detailed information, please refer to here.

 
丽水市| 古田县| 沈丘县| 曲阜市| 栖霞市| 灵石县| 碌曲县| 淄博市| 故城县| 象州县| 木兰县| 九龙县| 丽水市| 渭源县| 光泽县| 米脂县| 苏州市| 呈贡县| 建湖县| 大姚县| 和顺县| 罗田县| 靖远县| 颍上县| 谢通门县| 安化县| 太原市| 郸城县| 花莲市| 吴江市| 沙坪坝区| 北辰区| 桐庐县| 蓝山县| 平凉市| 大同县| 怀宁县| 鄢陵县| 丹棱县| 淳化县| 达日县|