国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Publications> Articles

Institutional Arrangements Should Follow Farmers’Steps

2016-01-11

By Zhao Shukai

The process of reform is one of remaking institutional arrangements. In terms of rural reform, the first fundamental methodological question is what is the basis for making institutional arrangements. The concepts and versions for new systems are generally expounded by officials and scholars. However, the essence of new systems should come from farmers and belong to farmers’ option and creation. The historical process of reform has revealed that any institutional arrangements against the willingness and behavioral logic of farmers is doomed to fail. It is held that the basic principle for making good institutional arrangements is to proactively follow farmers’ steps. Farmland is now no longer that important in farmers’ life. For a long time, farmland had played a core role in rural life in history. After land reform, the government policy towards farmland held a dominant position in political and economic development. The current land problems in rural areas can be summed up as the following three aspects.First, the problem of contracted land; second, the problem of homestead; and third, the problem of land expropriation. In recent years, revenues from land operation have witnessed a decreasing share in farmers’ income mix. The need of farmers for the land system is the key issue in rural development. All land issues focus on the issue of farmers’ rights. Land issues give a full expression to farmers’ squeezed rights in the process of contracted land adjustment, homestead management and land expropriation. It is found that farmers have their own expectations for rights, but they could not have them clearly expressed. In terms of social and economic life, the current farmers’ problems are not only related to land, or not mainly pertinent to land. Namely, it would be inappropriate to define farmers’ issues as merely land issues. To be precise, if there are any defects in institutional arrangements for farmers’ right in any social corner, and if farmers’ rights are not equally reflected, problems relating tofarmers would definitely occur. If we review the past historical events, we could easily find those touching scenes. When the farmers got land given to them by the Party,theybecame overwhelmed with joy. If these scenes really embodied the farmers’ happy emotions, then how is historical truth reflected? It is difficult to grasp the law of historical development and it is equally difficult to design the orientation of farmers’ progress. Even today, the progress of rural reform still requires the government to protect farmers’ creativity. The key to advancing reform is to free farmers from the restraints of systems and to endow and ensure basic citizen rights for farmers. Over the past half century and more, the progress of rural area’s development in China has proved that adjustments of policies and systems can become effective and vital only when they put the needs of farmers in the first place.

 
 
For more detailed information, please refer to here.

 

 
崇左市| 丹棱县| 南通市| 新疆| 澳门| 金坛市| 濉溪县| 怀安县| 塔河县| 洞口县| 江都市| 北辰区| 酉阳| 新和县| 雷州市| 浦江县| 融水| 安陆市| 屯留县| 西林县| 通河县| 昂仁县| 仙居县| 筠连县| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 玉门市| 福泉市| 闸北区| 宁南县| 凤城市| 阳山县| 伊宁市| 孙吴县| 仁寿县| 迁安市| 平顶山市| 准格尔旗| 阳西县| 隆德县| 杭锦后旗| 偃师市|