国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Publications> Articles

Conflicts in Rural Governance

2015-12-02

By Zhao Shukai, Development Research Center of the State Council

Over the past ten years and more since the turn of the new century, China's rural development has kept a sound momentum, with farmers' income increased rapidly, public product supply enriched, and rural residents' wellbeing remarkably improved. However, with regard to governance, rapid development has not brought sound governance, or if we could say, the governance quality has failed to rise to an extent compatible with economic and social development; governance quality is instead worsened in many aspects. The author holds that such phenomenon of "strong development but weak governance" has not only puzzled the public in understanding China's development, but also intensified social anxiety and unrest, thus leading to public puzzle over China's future performance. According to the author, this is mainly reflected as follows: first, development and governance are imbalanced. Currently, unsound performance in rural governance is mainly, viewing from the social perspective, demonstrated through intensified rural social conflicts and increased complaints by farmers against township government. As regards the government, the relationship between different levels of government has become rather tense, with less trust between various levels of governments as well as inadequate cooperation among them. Second, there is an intrinsic logical conflict with the system. The way to find out the reason for the occurrence and evolvement of China's social conflicts should focus on the government system itself. And third, system conflicts are chiefly reflected in the following four aspects: the system conflict relating to budget management, the system conflict concerning official management, the system conflict pertinent to government performance and accountability, and the system conflict between township government and primary-level self-governance.

 
For more detailed information, please refer to here.

 
富蕴县| 尤溪县| 图木舒克市| 柘荣县| 蚌埠市| 时尚| 通江县| 东莞市| 安吉县| 北川| 始兴县| 集安市| 遵义县| 松溪县| 布尔津县| 邵东县| 家居| 老河口市| 河曲县| 龙州县| 崇文区| 巴东县| 焉耆| 沭阳县| 贵定县| 鄂托克旗| 钟祥市| 于田县| 余姚市| 阳春市| 崇信县| 磐石市| 辰溪县| 凤庆县| 深泽县| 东台市| 乐昌市| 澄江县| 北京市| 依安县| 靖安县|