国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

   
 
2014 Typical trademark cases in China
(China Intellectual Property)
Updated: 2015-06-26

1. P&G

Procter & Gamble Co. (P&G) sued Beijing Royal Vidal Sassoon Beauty Hair School (Sassoon School) for trademark infringement of its registered trademarks, and unfair competition. In April 2014, Beijing Higher People’s Court rendered a final judgment, issuing an injunction against Sassoon School for infringing upon the exclusive trademark rights of P&G, and for unfair competition, ordering a statement on relevant newspapers to eliminate ill effects, cease and desist of use of “Sassoon,” and awarded damages of 500,000 yuan with reasonable to P&G.

P&G contended at trial that it has exclusive rights to use in China the registered trademarks of “沙宣” (Chinese transliteration of SASSOON), “VIDAL SASSOON” and “沙宣美發(fā)” (Chinese transliteration of “Sassoon Hair Salon”); that these marks have acquired strong distinctiveness and are well recognized among the relevant public thanks to its sustained publicity and use, that Sassoon School has used, without permission, in its facilities, ancillary supplies and promotions, signs and texts of “Royal Sassoon in Chinese characters,” “ROYAL VIDAL SASSOON BEAUTY HAIR SCHOOL” and “VIDAL SASSOON”; that these marks are substantially similar to its registered trademarks, causing public confusion and infringing its exclusive rights of use; that Sassoon School is a market competitor of P&G, and the registration and use in daily operations of the well-known trademark “Sassoon School,” which P&G has the exclusive trademark right, in the school name, has constituted an act of unfair competition; and therefore Sassoon School has made false propaganda through its domain name on its website “huangjiashaxuan.com” and other promotional materials, misleading consumers and harming its legitimate interests.

Unsatisfied with the trial court decision, Sassoon School appealed to Beijing Higher People’s Court, which rejected the appeal, holding that there was no sufficient ground to support the appeal. Although its business name is approved for registration, the market player should not harm the market reputation of others under the disguise of a legitimate form and shall not confuse its business name with registered trademarks of others. Sassoon School frequently used “Royal Sassoon” and other signs in its services, promotional materials and websites, thus having infringed the exclusive rights of P&G to use the registered trademarks, harmed the interests of P&G and constituted an act of unfair competition.

Accordingly, the court sustained the trial court’s decision.


Previous Page 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page


The J-Innovation

Steve Jobs died the month that the latest Nobel Prize winners were announced. The coincidence lends itself to speculation about inevitability.

Recommendation of Global IP Service Agencies with Chinese Business

Washable keyboard

The future of China & WTO

JETRO: A decade of development in China

宁安市| 交城县| 和龙市| 福安市| 徐汇区| 德惠市| 肥乡县| 洛南县| 大姚县| 汝南县| 休宁县| 隆林| 昌宁县| 保靖县| 榆树市| 台南县| 湘潭市| 石家庄市| 府谷县| 南阳市| 寻甸| 林州市| 积石山| 十堰市| 新平| 横峰县| 民勤县| 抚远县| 德昌县| 沁水县| 重庆市| 靖江市| 革吉县| 长春市| 阳江市| 青铜峡市| 湖北省| 阿瓦提县| 建德市| 鹤峰县| 雅江县|