国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
China
Home / China / View

Local govts' subsidies for property purchases serve their own interests

China Daily | Updated: 2016-12-23 08:03

THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT OF YU'AN DISTRICT in the city of Lu'an in East China's Anhui province recently posted on its official website information about the house purchase subsidies it had provided, which shows that a person purchased 44 apartments in one single community, accessing subsidies of about 800,000 yuan ($115,456) in all. It is time to reconsider the policies of many local governments to subsidize property purchases, says Beijing News:

A staff member from the real estate market regulatory office responded that the subsidies provided to the person were all legal, because the policy of the local government did not set any ceiling on the number of apartments a person could buy. They just "never expected that one would buy so many".

That exposes a major loophole in the policy of subsidizing people who buy properties, which is quite popular among local governments. As the property markets outside the big cities are stagnant, many local governments have resorted to offering buyers subsidies in order to revitalize their local real estate markets. Yet the case in Lu'an shows how unfair these policies can be.

All the subsidies are public money and come from taxpayers' pockets and they might flow into the hands of the rich, who can afford to buy dozens of apartments, rather than those who struggle to buy one.

Rumor also says that the developer co-worked with the purchaser in order to obtain the subsidy. That might be unfounded, but the danger of such a kind of cheating exists and in case that happens, taxpayers' money goes directly to the hands of realty developers.

Although the top leadership has made it clear that "houses should be for dwelling, not investing", many local governments adopt one policy after another in order to stimulate the realty market. They do so because their interests are deeply interwoven in the real estate industry. They sell land to developers for commercial use, and if the realty market goes down, that might cut a source of income for the local governments. But such policies are unfair because they subsidize the rich largely with the money of the poor.

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
勐海县| 海盐县| 峨眉山市| 柳河县| 丰城市| 德兴市| 滕州市| 卫辉市| 兰考县| 沂水县| 桦南县| 农安县| 肃北| 搜索| 仲巴县| 黎平县| 平果县| 濉溪县| 石楼县| 玛多县| 屯昌县| 颍上县| 黑龙江省| 山西省| 思茅市| 东乡县| 阿拉善盟| 乌鲁木齐市| 长子县| 错那县| 温州市| 那曲县| 邵武市| 油尖旺区| 临桂县| 开鲁县| 湖北省| 云林县| 奉新县| 永仁县| 黄骅市|