国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Ruling aims to protect personal data

Updated: 2015-09-10 07:33

By Kahon Chan in Hong Kong(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

Service providers who contact existing customers to renew contracts or subscriptions risk breaking Hong Kong's personal data protection laws if these customers opt out of direct marketing, according to a landmark ruling on Wednesday.

Internet service provider Hong Kong Broadband Network (HKBN) has been fined HK$30,000 at the Tsuen Wan Magistrates' Court, following the city's first conviction under the new personal abuse rule that took effect on April 1, 2013 by an amendment to the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance.

Data compilers, under the new law, have to gain the consent of individuals providing personal data before using such data for direct marketing purposes.

A HKBN subscriber, surnamed Chan, wrote to the company in April 2013 saying he did not want his data to be used for direct marketing. Just a month later, a customer service executive contacted Chan and left a voice message. The message mentioned a special renewal offer ahead of a planned fee rise.

Chan's complaint made to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data two years ago became the first case involving the new personal abuse rule to be heard in the court. It is expected to set a precedent for other service providers. The company pleaded not guilty, arguing the call was merely a reminder that Chan's subscription had expired.

But Magistrate Debbie Ng Chung-yee, referring to the company's template conversation transcripts approved by its legal advisors, ruled that HKBN had instructed customer service executives to use subscription renewals as a "prologue" to pitch new services and contract renewal offers.

The judge arrived at this conclusion based on the flow of the phone conversations - in particular, HKBN callers were instructed to fix another time to call again. This was even after subscribers were informed of the deadline and had responded by saying they wanted to deal with expiry of the service later.

Ruling aims to protect personal data

Chan still had more than six months before his contract expired when the call was made. A subscriber was expected to be aware of the terms of contract with or without a reminder, Ng noted.

Such a reminder could easily have been issued to the subscriber several weeks before the deadline.

She also deemed a conversation over the phone as unnecessary to make that reminder, noting a text message or a letter would have been more than enough.

The promotion of new contracts breached the direct marketing rule, Ng added, since it had not been included in the data usage clauses agreed to by subscribers.

HKBN had earlier defended itself saying that the caller, who has since resigned, was not following instructions. But Ng said there was no hard evidence that the company made efforts to prevent such breaches and, had the caller followed those scripts, her action would still likely have constituted an offense.

The company, in Ng's reasons given for the conviction, had used "expiration reminder" as an excuse and disregarded the subscriber's will to stay out of direct marketing. A HKBN spokesperson told media outside the court that they will study the reasons and file an appeal against the "disappointing" outcome.

But the spokesperson did not take questions, such as whether HKBN would change internal practices in light of the verdict.

Deputy Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data Fanny Wong Sam-hing commented that the verdict has drawn a clearer line between customer service and direct marketing for businesses that provide services through contract commitment. She hoped the sentence would act as a deterrent.

The maximum penalty for the offense for which HKBN has been convicted is a HK$500,000 fine.

The office received 509 complaints between April 2013 and August 2015, of which 45 cases were referred to the police. The court will hear another four cases soon, including that of a moving company which will stand trial next Monday. Other defendants include a beauty salon, a body check clinic and an insurance company.

kahon@chinadailyhk.com

(HK Edition 09/10/2015 page6)

遵义市| 射阳县| 眉山市| 亚东县| 彭阳县| 华宁县| 丰都县| 东安县| 龙游县| 黑山县| 会宁县| 金堂县| 广丰县| 武邑县| 叙永县| 太仓市| 曲麻莱县| 凤庆县| 红安县| 龙井市| 托里县| 宁远县| 左权县| 仁寿县| 盘山县| 贵港市| 怀仁县| 嘉禾县| 司法| 许昌县| 河东区| 黄冈市| 图木舒克市| 宜兰市| 天长市| 金川县| 曲阳县| 鹿邑县| 姚安县| 大名县| 启东市|