国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

In the press

Updated: 2013-09-20 15:34

(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

Timing and tough measures

The "tough measures" taken by the SAR government to cool the overheating property market have effectively slowed the rise of housing prices but also led to a dramatic fall in property transactions, which sometimes number just a handful per day. In response to calls for lifting the restrictions Financial Secretary John Tsang Chun-wah told the press on Wednesday that the "tough measures" are still necessary for now to prevent property prices from soaring irrationally again, and he hopes the Legislative Council (LegCo) would pass them as soon as possible, but they will be ended when the time is right.

It is now becoming more and more popular for governments to set preconditions for lifting market-control measures and none is more evident than the US Federal Reserve (Fed), which noted at its regular meeting in March that it would not end quantitative easing as long as inflation is 2.5 percent or higher, and the jobless rate above 6.5 percent. This is undoubtedly a plus in terms of transparency and offers the market a good barometer for making predictions. But what does it mean for Hong Kong's property market? When exactly is the right time to lift the anti-speculation curbs?

To answer the question one must consider the anti-speculation curbs are "extraordinary measures" in "extraordinary times" aimed at cooling the overheating market to prevent the asset bubble it creates from bursting and reducing the impact it has on people's well-being. That means the curbs will remain until the property market returns to normal, which of course concerns a number of factors. The first one is definitely market price, which raises the question: How high is reasonable? There is also the question of how much the price level should to be adjusted, and what if the fall is too steep, etc.

Another key factor is financial risk, which can issue from bad loans, negative assets and/or their impacts on property prices. Also to be considered is how soon the Fed will begin tightening money supply again and whether the influx of hot money will suddenly flow away. Then there is people's livelihood, which is directly linked to affordability and loan-repayment plans. Are we sure the target affordability level means people can buy properties and especially for youths who cannot even afford the first down payment?

Currently all signs indicate the time is not right to begin relaxing the restrictions, meaning the risk of an asset bubble burst is still high and the supply/demand ratio way off-kilter. Apparently now is not the best time to ease the "tough measures".

This is an excerpted translation of a Hong Kong Commercial Daily editorial published on Sept 19.

(HK Edition 09/20/2013 page9)

嘉禾县| 启东市| 德庆县| 鸡泽县| 金溪县| 扶余县| 茂名市| 隆昌县| 武义县| 永康市| 东阿县| 永州市| 和平县| 凭祥市| 云南省| 荥经县| 连平县| 义马市| 万年县| 长丰县| 政和县| 六安市| 宁安市| 黎城县| 博客| 太白县| 呈贡县| 丰顺县| 青阳县| 盘锦市| 伊吾县| 宜宾县| 汝阳县| 平乡县| 石阡县| 平邑县| 千阳县| 武定县| 永泰县| 新平| 汶上县|