国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

    Advanced Search  
  Opinion>Forum Columnists>T.P.Jackstraw
         
 

No one is saying that Taiwan should belong to the US!
T.P.Jackstraw  Updated: 2004-03-03 09:36

Thanks "abccbc" for contributing that article by Earl Carr from Asia Times Online, it was interesting and had some good points, I think.

However, it sounds to me like the two-stage strategy he proposed is a bit weak, and I don't see how these are Chinese characteristics.

I am having a hard time visualizing what that author meant about "... a public/private partnership ... to organize the private sector ...". What's that? Specifically, does this mean financial support form various Foundations to support US entrepreneurs who become involved in Chinese/Asian corporate ventures?

Also, I am also having a hard time visualizing what the author meant by "... in order to serve as a corporation for public diplomacy ...". Perhaps the author is speaking here about introducing US NGO's into Asia, or of the establishment of joint think-tank participation -- the idea of a 'public diplomacy corporation' seems vague to me.

I would say that the best Chinese characteristic that the US needs in its strategy to improve relationships with Asia, is to calm down and stop being overreactive and so aggressive.

But the first thing the US needs to do, to improve its relations with Asia, is give up on the idea of exporting democrazy by whatever means and force. Not only is this kind of activity contrary to the very tenants of the American foundation in man's inalienable rights, which absolutely include that of self-determination, but it creates an absolute distrust in the intent of the US government and their supporters.

However, this is not an idea the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) has yet to endorse. The US think-tanks, the training facilities of US power brokers, are intent on exporting their form of democracy wherever they can! This is not a genuine interest in peace, but a genuine interest in control, I think!

I note that some Taiwanese will claim Taiwan belongs solely to them, some Mainlanders would say Taiwan belongs solely to China, some might even say the two should share (clearly this is between the two of them no matter what anyone says!), but no one is saying that Taiwan should belong to the US!

TPJ

The above content represents the view of the author only.
 
  Story Tools  
   
Manufacturers, Exporters, Wholesalers - Global trade starts here.
Advertisement
         

| Home | News | Business | Living in China | Forum | E-Papers |Weather |

|About Us | Contact Us | Site Map | Jobs |
Copyright 2005 Chinadaily.com.cn All rights reserved. Registered Number: 20100000002731
陆良县| 梓潼县| 连山| 司法| 贵德县| 绥德县| 荔浦县| 东明县| 平陆县| 康马县| 泸溪县| 大石桥市| 平谷区| 当雄县| 天峨县| 光泽县| 浦江县| 台中市| 桂林市| 兴隆县| 什邡市| 方山县| 梁平县| 平陆县| 阆中市| 固安县| 宜城市| 台北县| 宁津县| 天峻县| 来安县| 普定县| 定兴县| 全椒县| 天峨县| 英吉沙县| 绍兴市| 常德市| 青海省| 抚松县| 蓝山县|