国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

  Home>News Center>Bizchina>Review & Analysis
       
 

Internal woes do not justify protectionism
(China Daily)
Updated: 2005-06-06 09:08

After a little action and some rhetoric between the United States and China on the latter's rapid textile export growth, two top US trade officials came to Beijing over the weekend to meet with their Chinese counterparts.

US Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez called on the Chinese side to understand the political pressure the US Government bears over the textile issue.

He is honest, but his point is weak.

Domestic politics is no excuse for violating international agreements.

Domestic problems should be resolved domestically. Letting trading partners and free trade as a whole pay for one's internal woes does not look good, and is not acceptable.

The liberalization of the textile trade since the beginning of this year is a result of an agreement devised within the World Trade Organization (WTO).

Developed WTO members such as the United States and European nations signed the agreement as a concession to developing members.

What the rich countries obtained was wider market access for their high-value products. They achieved that end.

Their textile industries can be said to have paid a price in this process. But they paid it for the strong industries of their own nations. US and EU textile workers are not sacrificing themselves for their peers in developing countries such as China.

In fact, the US and EU governments could have taken steps to protect against the impact of the liberalization of the textile trade. They had 10 years to do so after the agreement was signed.

They could have helped textile enterprises upgrade or worked out other internal solutions to prevent their workers from suffering.

But they did very little, which was a mistake.

When the real impact arrived, they blamed China, and quickly moved to breach the agreement and attempted to shift the pressure to Chinese textile workers.

This is sheer protectionism.

Both the United States and the EU should reconsider their approach of mixing domestic politics with international trade too much.

If other WTO members also take this approach it will be disastrous for the organization, and the course of free trade.

In fact, the Chinese side has showed its flexibility on the issue by announcing on May 20 to impose higher export tax on some of its textile products, a move ignored by the United States and the EU.

China has now revoked the tax, and Commerce Minister Bo Xilai has also hinted at possible retaliation China could take.

But still he said China does not want a trade war and is willing to solve the problem through consultation.

The messages that Chinese officials delivered indicate that they could accept a result that both safeguards China's interests and leaves room for the restructuring of the US and EU textile industries.

Gutierrez and US trade representative Rob Portman - who also joined the talks with Chinese officials - now have first-hand knowledge about China's position.

They are expected to go home with this understanding: The Chinese can be co-operative, but they refuse to be a scapegoat for US domestic problems.



 
  Story Tools  
   
Advertisement
         
<td id="bycxp"></td>
<td id="bycxp"></td><address id="bycxp"></address>
  1. <address id="bycxp"></address>
    <listing id="bycxp"></listing>

    <small id="bycxp"></small><dfn id="bycxp"></dfn> 平利县| 含山县| 华安县| 民县| 宜章县| 鹤山市| 瑞昌市| 福建省| 辽宁省| 清苑县| 峨眉山市| 邵阳县| 曲阜市| 永嘉县| 荃湾区| 万盛区| 浦江县| 古浪县| 安远县| 宜兰县| 沂源县| 任丘市| 西昌市| 辽宁省| 阳朔县| 时尚| 竹溪县| 苗栗县| 泗水县| 宁强县| 绩溪县| 康定县| 南涧| 繁昌县| 巴南区| 女性| 沛县| 沾益县| 时尚| 桐庐县| 潜江市|