国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Home / World

Drug firms face monopoly fines

By Liu Jie | China Daily | Updated: 2011-11-15 07:55

Drug firms face monopoly fines 

An employee checks inventory at a drugstore at Zouping county in Shandong province. More than 10 million patients, mostly in the low- and middle-income groups, use reserpine tablets in China, with between 8 and 9 billion pills taken annually. Dong Naide / For China Daily

BEIJING - The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) said on Monday it would impose large fines on two domestic drug companies for monopoly pricing, the first heavy anti-monopoly penalty in China.

Analysts said the case signals that the government plans to standardize the price-setting system for drugs and crack down on monopolies.

The fines were set at 6.877 million yuan ($1.08 million) for Shandong Weifang Shuntong Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and 152,600 yuan for Shandong Weifang Huaxin Medicine Trade Co Ltd, and their illegal gains will be confiscated in line with the anti-monopoly law.

An investigation by the NDRC's price supervision and anti-monopoly department found that the companies controlled the raw material supply for compound reserpine tablets, a treatment for high blood pressure that is on China's essential drug list.

The NDRC said that the two companies, which do manufacture some drugs but do not produce the medicine involved in this case, acted as distributors for the raw materials.

They forced makers of the drug to buy higher-cost raw materials and told the actual manufacturers what retail price to charge patients for the tablet, said the NDRC.

The department said that the behavior constituted a monopolistic practice and inflicted great harm on the medicine-pricing system.

On June 6, Shuntong and Huaxin signed sole-agent agreements with two national providers of pro-methazine hydrochloride, a raw material used to make compound reserpine tablets.

Shuntong and Huaxin stipulated that the two suppliers couldn't sell the substance to any other company without their permission.

Four large domestic companies make these tablets, supplying about 75 percent of the market. When the four were unable to get the necessary raw materials, they were forced to turn to Shuntong and Huaxin.

The two Shandong-based companies would only supply the drugmakers if they agreed to increase the price of compound reserpine tablets to 5 to 6 yuan a bottle - containing 100 pills - from the original 1.3 yuan a bottle, according to Wan Jiang, an official of the bureau.

The retail price is only 0.08 yuan a tablet.

More than 10 million patients, mostly low- and middle-income people, use this medicine in China. About 8 to 9 billion pills are taken annually.

Calls to Shuntong for comment were not answered. A man surnamed Ma at Huaxin, who declined to give his full name, said that he had no comment on the NDRC's penalty.

China introduced a price-setting system for its essential drug list. The reform aimed to cut costs for patients and insurers.

However, some pharmaceutical companies use various tactics, such as raw material monopolies, to force the price of medicines on the list to surge, thwarting the government's cost-reduction efforts, said Jiang Linkui, general manager of Harbin Pharmaceutical Group Holding Co Ltd.

"The penalty is an obvious sign that the government has decided to standardize the price-setting system, a positive sign to law-abiding domestic and foreign pharmaceutical companies," said Lydia Xu, an industry researcher at the Samsung Economic Research Institute.

"Stricter execution of government regulations will help players compete on a fair platform."

China has been strengthening its crackdown on monopoly practices recently.

The NDRC said on Wednesday that it was probing the nation's two telecom giants - China Telecom Corp Ltd and China Unicom (Hong Kong) Ltd - for allegedly taking advantage of their dominant positions in broadband access to suppress competition from rivals and charge high fees.

Li Shuguang, a professor at the China University of Political Science and Law, said that the cases indicated that China is to improve its anti-monopoly legislation. "It's a good start," he added.

Chen Keyu contributed to this story.

China Daily

(China Daily 11/15/2011 page15)

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
南皮县| 红原县| 化州市| 龙门县| 高唐县| 扎鲁特旗| 饶阳县| 贵定县| 利川市| 庆安县| 阿克苏市| 临高县| 崇义县| 贡山| 许昌市| 吴桥县| 临武县| 山西省| 锦屏县| 娄烦县| 团风县| 富蕴县| 大悟县| 喀什市| 临沂市| 遵义县| 山阴县| 垦利县| 瑞丽市| 土默特左旗| 晋中市| 桓台县| 修文县| 桃园市| 金坛市| 桂东县| 禄丰县| 武强县| 长岭县| 吉安市| 湘阴县|