国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

   
  home feedback about us  
   
CHINAGATE.OPINION.Social security    
Agriculture  
Education&HR  
Energy  
Environment  
Finance  
Legislation  
Macro economy  
Population  
Private economy  
SOEs  
Sci-Tech  
Social security  
Telecom  
Trade  
Transportation  
Rural development  
Urban development  
     
     
 
 
Invest in basic public services


2006-07-11
China Daily

More money should be invested in public services, says a signed article in China Economic Daily. An excerpt follows:

Professor Wu Zhongmin from the Party School of Communist Party of China Central Committee recently pointed out that, as a proportion of its gross domestic product (GDP), China's investment in its basic public services is among the lowest in the world.

More efforts should be made in the reforms in related areas including social security, compulsory education, public health and housing.

Zhou Tianyong, another professor from the Party School, compared public spending in China and the United States. In 2004, China's administrative expenditure accounted for 37.6 per cent of total fiscal expenses while the percentage for the United States was 12.5. China's proportion of investment in economic construction was 11.6 per cent while it was 5 per cent for the United States. The proportion of expenses in public services was 25 per cent for China, while it was 75 per cent in the United States.

The Chinese Government's administrative costs are rather high. This is connected with overstaffing in government departments and their high spending. High spending on administrative affairs and economic construction undoubtedly impacts on investment in public services.

Investment in public services should be the top priority of public spending. But this is not always the case.

Some government officials' concept of administrative performance is the major culprit. Many of them attach far too much importance to GDP growth. Investment in public services does not directly lead to GDP growth, so they care little for it.

It is an institutional unfairness that government input in public goods and services is low. The situation should be changed to let the majority of the people enjoy the fruits of economic development.

 
 
     
  print  
     
  go to forum  
     
     
 
home feedback about us  
  Produced by www.hwdly.com.cn. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@chinagate.com.cn
塔河县| 延庆县| 方正县| 二连浩特市| 沾益县| 凌云县| 旌德县| 斗六市| 贵定县| 晋江市| 津南区| 遵义市| 克东县| 景洪市| 齐齐哈尔市| 乐东| 宜城市| 凉城县| 上林县| 九台市| 威远县| 土默特左旗| 红河县| 涟水县| 南岸区| 新竹市| 福建省| 紫阳县| 海林市| 偃师市| 隆子县| 阜城县| 余干县| 自治县| 崇礼县| 新干县| 广东省| 渭源县| 邮箱| 沛县| 宿州市|