国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / Innovation

Controversial gene-editing study retracted from top journal

By Ma Chi | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2017-08-03 11:46

A Chinese scientist has retracted the study of a controversial gene-editing technology from a world-leading journal after the science community raised questions about the research's authenticity.

In an announcement published on Wednesday, the research team led by Han Chunyu, an associate professor with Hebei University of Science and Technology, said they retracted the paper because of the continued inability of the research community to reproduce the key results in their?paper on Argonaute protein (NgAgo), which they claimed to be a powerful genome-editing tool.

"Despite the efforts of many laboratories, an independent replication of these results has not been reported. We are therefore retracting our initial report at this time to maintain the integrity of the scientific record," said the announcement published?on Nature Biotechnology.?

Han and his colleagues published the paper in the journal in May last year, claiming that NgAgo was a better gene editor than the widely used CRISPR–Cas9 approach.

The findings of the study were widely reported, especially in the Chinese media. According to the media monitor site Meltwater, nearly 4,000 Chinese news stories cited Han's paper in just the first two months after the publication.

However, the failure of an increasing number of scientists from abroad and home?to reproduce the results of the?study raised doubts that the protein works as a gene editor.

In November, Nature Biotechnology published an?article to alert its readers to potential problems with the NgAgo paper, and asked Han's team to explain the failures of the science community to reproduce their results.

A month later, Han's team and other independent groups provided new data claiming to have produced NgAgo gene-editing activity, but they were judged too preliminary to warrant publication, according to an editorial published by the journal alongside the retraction announcement.

Before the decision to retract the paper, Han stood by his results, arguing that cell contamination may explain the failures to reproduce the study.

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
安图县| 阿坝| 当阳市| 宜君县| 和田县| 易门县| 渝北区| 永兴县| 池州市| 洪泽县| 井陉县| 澄城县| 五华县| 怀远县| 铁岭县| 合作市| 桃源县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 陇川县| 桑植县| 宣城市| 哈密市| 泸定县| 阜新市| 罗江县| 营口市| 井研县| 辽阳县| 康定县| 汾阳市| 永平县| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 平安县| 乌兰浩特市| 镇巴县| 长春市| 洪雅县| SHOW| 电白县| 凤翔县| 延寿县|