国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / Society

Lawyers call for end to child-snatching custody tactics

Agencies | Updated: 2016-12-30 07:38

Dai Xiaolei last saw her son in 2014, when he was 17 months old and living with her in-laws in Baoding, a city in Hebei province about 156 kilometers from Beijing.

Her marriage was crumbling and, as relations deteriorated, she claims her husband's family blocked her from taking her son with her back to the capital.

"The last time I saw my son was at the end of this alley. It's like a fortress," the 37-year-old said outside her in-laws former home.

Reuters was unable to independently verify Dai's claim that the family has blocked all attempts to see her son.

Her husband, Liu Jie, filed for divorce, arguing that the marriage had fallen apart due to "conflicts in character, ideas and living habits", according to court documents. Dai pushed for custody, but in April, a judge ruled that it was best for the boy's physical and mental health to stay with his father.

Liu, a movie stunt coordinator, and his parents declined to comment.

As China's divorce rate rises, so too have calls by legal professionals for new laws that would clamp down on aggressive tactics used by some parents to take or retain possession of a child to gain the upper hand in custody battles.

Lawyers say judges tend to favor the parent who already has physical possession of the child in order to avoid further disruption to their life.

Dai appealed the custody ruling and lost. The court said the child's living environment was relatively stable and any change would not benefit his upbringing.

There are no laws against one parent taking sole possession of a child against the wishes of the other, lawyers say, reflecting a traditional view that family conflicts should handled privately.

The Supreme People's Court declined to comment on specific cases, but it said, "Maximizing benefit to the child is the basic principle by which custody decisions are made."

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
冷水江市| 仲巴县| 贵州省| 宜君县| 白水县| 独山县| 旺苍县| 罗定市| 漳州市| 沁水县| 曲麻莱县| 伊宁市| 水城县| 禹城市| 东山县| 柳河县| 长白| 沙坪坝区| 厦门市| 阿合奇县| 乌苏市| 通江县| 七台河市| 凉山| 双桥区| 兰西县| 托里县| 贵州省| 德清县| 富蕴县| 潍坊市| 神池县| 沾益县| 大同市| 新泰市| 盘锦市| 株洲县| 达日县| 梅河口市| 崇左市| 阿图什市|