国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / Society

Apple in Shanghai court over 'Siri' claim

By Shi Yingying in Shanghai | China Daily | Updated: 2013-03-28 07:18

Apple Inc, the US electronics giant, appeared in court in Shanghai on Wednesday, accused of intellectual property right infringement involving software used on "Siri", its intelligent digital assistant.

Shanghai Zhizhen Network Technology Co, the developer of a voice technology called "Xiao i Robot", is alleging that the Apple assistant infringed its patent, in particular relating to "a type of instant messaging chat robot system".

Siri responds to a user's commands through voice recognition software.

A preliminary hearing - during which both sides can present evidence to the court before a formal hearing starts - was held at Shanghai No 1 Intermediate People's Court. The formal hearing is scheduled for July 2.

According to evidence presented by Zhizhen, its chat robot system was filed for patent with China's State Intellectual Property Office on Aug 13, 2004, and approved on Feb 15, 2006.

Siri Inc, a start-up company Apple acquired in 2010, started producing the virtual mobile assistant in 2007.

Apple included the technology on its iPhone 4S smart phone in 2011.

Apple, however, said Siri had gained an international patent and the company had applied to China's State Intellectual Property Office for the invalidation of Xiao i Robot's patent right.

Zhizhen Chairman Yuan Hui said his company demands Apple stop the infringement, and that means "Apple Computer Trading (Shanghai) Co and Apple Inc have to stop the manufacture, sale and use of products with Siri technology in China, such as iPhone 4S, iPhone 5, iPad 3, iPad 4 and iPod touch 5", explained Yuan Yang, an attorney representing Zhizhen.

"There are two possible results once the infringement is confirmed - Apple may bypass the Siri technology, or it may acquire or cooperate with Zhizhen in China," said Yuan.

Zhizhen filed the suit on June 21, 2012, only a few days after Apple paid $60 million to Proview Technology (Shenzhen) to end a protracted legal dispute over the iPad trademark in China.

The company said judging from the iPhone 4S' promotional slogan, which describes Siri as a character-driven intelligent personal assistant, Apple violated one of its patents.

"Xiao i Robot is not as famous as Siri only because we sell it as our technical core to varied types of clients, including China Merchants Bank and Shanghai Meteorological Bureau. Users get to know it under our clients' name," said Mei Li from Zhizhen's marketing department, adding that Xiao i Robot now has 100 million users across China, including some local government departments.

Apple said at Wednesday's hearing that detailed technical appraisal and analysis on Siri and Xiao i Robot should be presented as evidence to determine whether Siri has violated Zhizhen's intellectual property rights, which Zhizhen has failed to provide.

"The court only needs one essential technical feature to not rule the infringement, for example, unlike Xiao i Robot, Siri does not have a game platform," said Apple's attorney surnamed Yang.

This is the third time Apple has been sued in China for patent infringement.

It lost a battle for the use of the iPad name in China and was accused of infringing trademark rights by Jiangsu Xuebao Daily Chemical Co.

However, some industry insiders and lawyers doubt Zhizhen's motivation for filing the lawsuit.

Geng Yan, a smartphone specialist at CCID Consulting Co, said Siri and Xiao i Robot have overlapping functions such as online chatting and information inquiries, but that is common for technology companies.

"The settlement with Proview could be seen as a benchmark for what Apple is willing to pay for clean access to a trademark, but that would also embolden trademark trolls looking to make a quick buck off Apple," said Geng, adding there is also the possibility that Zhizhen is using the lawsuit to gauge its popularity on the domestic market.

Li Jinjian, a lawyer in Beijing who specializes in intellectual property, said that there is a reason why Zhizhen chose Apple rather than some small technology companies as its target to sue. "Because it's rich enough to pay," he said.

shiyingying@chinadaily.com.cn

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
疏勒县| 佛山市| 四会市| 乡城县| 冕宁县| 阳谷县| 江都市| 大安市| 武邑县| 隆子县| 长葛市| 杭州市| 灵武市| 江门市| 巴林左旗| 林甸县| 温泉县| 电白县| 克山县| 西宁市| 高密市| 玛纳斯县| 平武县| 桐乡市| 灵台县| 宜都市| 正定县| 双牌县| 前郭尔| 乃东县| 孝义市| 东方市| 台东市| 平顶山市| 都兰县| 宝应县| 恩平市| 曲周县| 舞钢市| 绥阳县| 临城县|