国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

CHINA> National
Mixed reaction to WTO ruling
By Ding Qingfen and Liu Wei (China Daily)
Updated: 2009-08-14 07:00

* The ruling, if approved by WTO, would adversely affect the two importers of foreign films. But other companies hailed the ruling.

* It's understandable China takes measures to protect the film industry from being invaded by foreign products, said an associate professor from Beijing Film Academy.

China may appeal a ruling by the World Trade Organization (WTO) that would break up a monopoly of two State-owned firms as the sole foreign audiovisuals importers.

A WTO dispute settlement panel, in a report released yesterday, ruled that China's practices were inconsistent with international trade rules, and that China needs to revise them.

The US filed the case two years ago. The case involves publications, audio and video products, and music download services imported by China.

Related readings:
Mixed reaction to WTO ruling China regrets WTO ruling on publications restrictions
Mixed reaction to WTO ruling WTO upholds US complaint over China's film, music, book imports
Mixed reaction to WTO ruling China files WTO complaint on EU anti-dumping measures
Mixed reaction to WTO ruling China requests WTO panel to probe US poultry import ban 
Mixed reaction to WTO ruling 
China should learn to apply WTO dispute mechanism

The ruling, if approved by WTO, would adversely affect the two importers of foreign films. But other companies hailed the ruling.

"It is good news for private companies. We would like to join in. The game was unfair, but I believe complete competition is coming," said Wang Zhonglei, president of Huayi Brothers, China's leading privately owned media company.

The Chinese government has appointed China Film Group and Huaxia Film Distribution to import and distribute audiovisuals from abroad.

This, as the US claimed, has not only run against the fundamental WTO rules requiring equal treatment between local and foreign businesses, but also breached the commitment China made when it joined the WTO to open up sales and distribution.

"China has been performing its duty on publications market access, and we have been providing unblocked access to overseas imports of audiovisual products," the Ministry of Commerce said yesterday on its website.

"We regret the dispute panel did not turn down the US."

China has imported approximately 500,000 titles of publications of all kinds every year since joining the WTO in 2001, as promised in its entry agreement.

Under the WTO framework, the US and China must decide within two months whether to appeal any part of the ruling.

"We will carefully evaluate the report," the ministry said.

The ministry's Department of Treaty and Law, which is responsible for the issue, refused to comment.

Lin Xiaoxia, associate professor from Beijing Film Academy, defended China's policies.

"Film in China can be hardly a pure commercial product. Its educational and social functions are still important. It's understandable China takes measures to protect the film industry from being invaded by foreign products, especially when ours is still too weak to compete," Lin said.

But Tao Jingzhou, a partner of US Jones Day, a leading international law firm, said China has little chance of winning an appeal.

The American Chamber of Commerce China also hailed the ruling.

 

 

岳阳县| 建瓯市| 丹巴县| 华池县| 富平县| 金昌市| 江永县| 星子县| 牡丹江市| 怀仁县| 泸定县| 武城县| 鄂托克旗| 徐水县| 六枝特区| 青阳县| 阜康市| 乐安县| 大安市| 武山县| 屏山县| 东丰县| 上思县| 涞水县| 眉山市| 即墨市| 西昌市| 二手房| 大丰市| 蒲江县| 富裕县| 沙坪坝区| 定南县| 延安市| 满城县| 漳平市| 福泉市| 宁德市| 区。| 衡东县| 盘锦市|