国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

BIZCHINA> Center
Danone to fight on after verdict
By Tuo Yannan (China Daily)
Updated: 2008-08-06 08:55

Danone to fight on after verdict

In response to the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court ruling in favor of Wahaha's right to its trademark, Danone Group yesterday said it will pursue all legal options to protect its contractual rights and financial interests.

Wahaha spokesman Shan Qining said: "What we want to say to Danone's statement is only one sentence: 'We respect the decision of the court and we respect the law.'"

Hangzhou-based Wahaha Group had earlier said the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court had rejected Danone's appeal of Hangzhou arbitration commission's ruling in favor of Wahaha in a dispute over the ownership of the Wahaha trademark.

The Wahaha spokesman said the ruling was a key development in its prolonged dispute with its French partner, and should have a positive impact on another dispute that is now before an arbitration commission.

Danone Group argued that the Hangzhou arbitration commission's ruling had "distorted the facts of the case, intentionally and maliciously misinterpreted and misapplied the laws of the People's Republic of China, and was an award that completely ignored the facts and law".

Danone had also said it hoped the Hangzhou court would carry out the substantive review, apart from the procedural review, of the legality of the arbitral procedures.

In its latest statement, Danone said: "The Hangzhou court only carried out a procedural review for this case (specifically, the Hangzhou court failed to conduct a substantive review of the accuracy and legality of the determination of facts and application of law) and rendered its ruling based on a procedural review only."

Although the Hangzhou court ruling is final, Danone said it would report the matter to the appropriate superior judicial authorities in China. It also said the arbitration proceedings in Stockholm would begin hearing in January.

Last year, Danone filed its first lawsuit against Wahaha on May 9 in Stockholm, and on June 4, Danone filed another lawsuit in Los Angeles against two Wahaha-related companies and two individuals.

Since 2006, the two companies have filed numerous complaints and lawsuits against each other under various Chinese and foreign jurisdictions.

Danone, which owns a 51 percent stake in 39 Danone-Wahaha joint ventures, has accused Wahaha of setting up independent companies and selling products identical to those sold by the joint ventures. Danone had demanded a 51 percent stake in the non-joint-venture companies, which Wahaha rejected.

 


(For more biz stories, please visit Industries)

 

 

文成县| 广宁县| 江津市| 名山县| 澄江县| 内黄县| 溧阳市| 新平| 米脂县| 保靖县| 常州市| 闻喜县| 华阴市| 东明县| 蛟河市| 墨脱县| 长汀县| 托克逊县| 澄城县| 德安县| 和田市| 上栗县| 嵩明县| 依安县| 巫山县| 丰镇市| 汝南县| 平凉市| 德清县| 乐业县| 出国| 宿松县| 宜章县| 酒泉市| 阿荣旗| 郧西县| 丰宁| 辽中县| 阜阳市| 沙洋县| 乐业县|