国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Business / Opinion

Is China losing competitiveness or moving up value chain?

By Wang Tao and Harrison Hu (chinadaily.com.cn) Updated: 2014-03-28 18:18

II. The appreciation of the RMB

Indeed, the RMB has appreciated by almost 20 percent against the US dollar since 2008 while many other emerging currencies have either depreciated or strengthened only modestly against the green back (Figure 9). As a result, RMB's effective exchange rate, or the rate against a trade-weighted basket of partner currencies, has appreciated by 27 percent in nominal terms and 33 percent in real terms (adjusted by consumer price inflation) since 2008 (Figure 10).

Is China losing competitiveness or moving up value chain?

As a result of the substantial real appreciation, the RMB is no longer undervalued. Back in 2010, we used a number of methods and models to estimate the undervaluation of the RMB. Based on the most commonly used macroeconomic balance approach, our latest estimate shows that the RMB is no longer undervalued. China's current account surplus has fallen to just below 3 percent if adjust for the cyclical weakness in global demand, or what the macroeconomic fundamentals suggest as China's "equilibrium" current account surplus. In other words, the RMB is no longer undervalued from the macroeconomic fundamental's point of view. Even the estimate by the Peterson Institute, which has often been used by the US congress to support its pressure on RMB appreciation, suggests that RMB's undervaluation was largely gone by 2012.

III. Has China lost competitiveness?

The sharp real appreciation has led to an erosion of China's competitiveness. The simplest thing to look at is the adjustment in China's external balance – China's current account surplus has shrunk from the peak of 10 percent of GDP in 2007, just before the global financial crisis, to 2.1 percent in 2013 (1.7 percent if adjusted for over-invoicing of exports, Figure 11). As Chinese exports continue to outpace global trade, China's market share globally has continued to rise, albeit more slowly than before. However, China's market share in G3 economies has started to decline (Figure 12).

By sector, the loss of competitiveness in China's traditionally strong labour-intensive sectors has been more notable, including apparels, shoes and toys. For example, China's market share in apparels exports to the US has declined in recent years while cheaper products from countries like Vietnam and Bangladesh have gained ground (Figure 13). Another area that China seems to have lost out is transport equipment (automobiles and parts) – as shown in figure 14, China's market share in the US and EU have declined especially since the global financial crisis, while that of Mexico has risen substantially in the past decade. There may be additional reasons why such a change has taken place apart from the divergence in movements in labour costs. One possible reason is that transport cost matters with high energy cost, and Mexico's proximity to the US market and US auto producers is a great advantage. Another reason is that China's own domestic automobile market has grown rapidly into the largest market in the world, absorbing Chinese production and making exports less attractive.

Is China losing competitiveness or moving up value chain?

Is China losing competitiveness or moving up value chain?

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
...
芦溪县| 蓬安县| 日喀则市| 大港区| 英吉沙县| 洛南县| 潮州市| 宁阳县| 临猗县| 泾阳县| 乐安县| 南开区| 柳江县| 阿城市| 大城县| 防城港市| 肥西县| 新源县| 贵溪市| 南涧| 河池市| 和林格尔县| 高尔夫| 巨野县| 奎屯市| 望奎县| 田林县| 微博| 进贤县| 新龙县| 涞水县| 平邑县| 毕节市| 澳门| 衡山县| 行唐县| 武平县| 柳州市| 永胜县| 板桥市| 朔州市|