国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

   

Shoemakers to suffer EU anti-dumping hit

By Diao Ying (China Daily)
Updated: 2006-12-19 09:49

The vast majority of Chinese footwear manufacturers will most likely not file suit against an anti-dumping tariff from the European Union as the deadline for litigation draws near, partly due to what would be expensive, lengthy legal battles.

Related readings:
 Trade: Europe deficit with China hits new high
 Firms prepare for EU rules on chemical goods imports
 China economy status deal might help EU
 Ministry of Commerce backs shoemakers' EU lawsuits

The European Union has imposed a 16.5 per cent anti-dumping tariff on leather shoes imported from China since October 7. Over 1,200 shoemakers were effected, though only four are fighting back through lawsuits in the EU courts.

Two of these firms are Zhejiang-based enterprises, including Aokang Group, the largest privately owned footwear manufacturer, and Taima Shoes Group, the third-largest shoe firm in the province. They are joined by two Guangdong-based companies: Golden Step Industrial Co Ltd and Xinsheng Gangyuan Shoes Group.

Guo Weiwen, an official with another Guangdong-based company, Apach Footwear, said that most small- and medium-sized enterprises are trying to work around the tariffs.

"Most enterprises turn to other strategies such as adjusting product structure and changing their export market," she said. "Some of them even plan to recede from the EU market."

Wang Xuehua, a lawyer specializing in anti-dumping with the Beijing Huanzhong Law Firm said that the high cost, complicated legal procedures, and unpredictable result of suing has stopped most enterprises from filing.

The legal procedure to counter anti-dumping charges can be very time consuming, and "it is possible that the two-year period will come to an end before the investigation is completed," said Wei Yafei, a spokeswoman with the China Leather Industry Association.

The four bigger players that are suing, however, feel they have a case.

"The European Union's action does not follow the rules of the World Trade Organization and the convention of the industry," said Liao Yue, chairman of Taima, one of the companies taking legal action. "They imposed tariffs on us without investigating my company."

The two Guangdong enterprises that decided to file the suit, according to Guo of Apach, were "the sample enterprises chosen by the European Union during the investigation, so they have experience in dealing with legal issues."

Shoemaker Aokang said it already handed its litigation materials to the European court in Brussels and are waiting for reaction.

"We hope we can learn something from this case, and we need to gain some experience for other enterprises in the future," said Wei Kaimeng, a spokesman with Aokang.


(For more biz stories, please visit Industry Updates)



宾川县| 蒙自县| 平阴县| 丰都县| 彝良县| 望谟县| 屏山县| 咸宁市| 松滋市| 瑞安市| 广灵县| 聂荣县| 青川县| 青州市| 固阳县| 怀安县| 子洲县| 岳阳市| 磴口县| 海晏县| 凭祥市| 庐江县| 温泉县| 炎陵县| 安国市| 渝中区| 松阳县| 吉木萨尔县| 双柏县| 三门县| 扶风县| 松溪县| 大关县| 响水县| 扶绥县| 馆陶县| 桐柏县| 崇信县| 岢岚县| 江西省| 德江县|