A recent poll carried out by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences showed
that in Beijing's city construction not enough attention has been paid to the
needs of low-income earners. Some sociologists pointed out that several measures
had begun to cause "practical harm."
At the beginning of last year, the Beijing municipal government proposed to
build Beijing as an habitable city. The proposal was widely praised by the
general public.
Since then, Beijing had devoted much effort and money to
its city construction improvement. However, little achievement has been made. In
fact, the city's habitability has even fallen back compared with last year.
In December 2005, the Business Weekly magazine and the Horizon Research
Consultancy Group jointly published a list on Chinese cities' habitability
degree in 2005. The list showed that Beijing's habitability ranking had dropped
from the third position in 2004 to the 15th.
On June 6, 2006, the Horizon Research Consultancy Group selected 20 cities in
China and published a list on their favorability degree for making investment.
The list showed that Beijing ranked first on the list. However, in another list
published by the same company on a city's habitability, Beijing came 19th , or
second from bottom.
On June 22, Professor Zhang Wenzhong from the Geosciences and Resources
Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences led a research team to
conduct a questionnaire investigation among more than 11,000 people. The poll
result concludes that Beijing's habitability has dropped to 63.8 points, just
passing the qualified mark.
By analyzing the poll result, researchers found that people earning a monthly
income of over 10,000 yuan was most satisfied with the city's habitability,
while families earning 3,000 yuan or less were "most unsatisfied" with the
city's habitability.
Regarding the correlation between people's sense of habitability and their
monthly income, researchers explained that at present, Beijing's city
construction work had not provided much convenience to low-income earners. This
had caused a negative impact on their living quality that covered nearly every
aspect of their life, including daily life, transportation, safety issue, health
and comfort.
(For more biz stories, please visit Industry Updates)
