国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

UK’s scapegoating sanctions of Chinese entities ill-advised

By Li Yang | China Daily | Updated: 2026-03-03 20:01
Share
Share - WeChat
[Photo/VCG]

If economics teaches anything, it is that policy inconsistency carries a price. The United Kingdom's decision to impose a new round of sanctions on Chinese enterprises under what it calls "Russia-related" grounds is such a case in point.

The UK sanctions on Chinese entities over the Ukraine crisis are unilateral moves lacking basis in international law and without authorization from the United Nations. The sanctions weaken the very "rules-based system" and the "international law" the UK professes to defend. No wonder a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce expressed the country's resolute opposition to the move.

The UK's ridiculous "justification" for the move rests on China being an "enabler" of Russia's "special military operation" in Ukraine. China implements dual-use materials export controls strictly in accordance with the law. The normal commercial exchanges between China and Russia should not be subject to the UK's policy. On the contrary, the UK's broad-brush penalties on Chinese entities are more like geopolitical signaling.

The deeper issue is Europe's own security predicament. Multiple European studies have documented how decades of underinvestment have left Europe structurally dependent on the United States to build a defense umbrella. The Ukraine crisis did not create this imbalance; it exposed it.

Groundlessly scapegoating China diverts attention from a harder truth: Europe's security architecture has long been subcontracted to Washington. As debates in Berlin, Paris and Brussels increasingly acknowledge, strategic autonomy cannot be built on slogans. It requires resources, unity and institutional reform. Sanctioning Chinese companies will not solve Europe's credibility gap; it may, however, deepen economic fragmentation at a moment when growth is already fragile.

As Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi reiterated at the Munich Security Conference last month, the regional issues, including the Ukraine crisis, should be resolved through dialogue and consultation. Beijing is not a party to the conflict and has dispatched special envoys to facilitate talks. As Wang said, Europe should not be "on the menu" but "at the table". The conflict is on European soil; a durable settlement requires European actions.

Europe has every right — and responsibility — to help establish a balanced, effective and sustainable security architecture of its own. Yet, building such an architecture means stepping up to the plate to address root causes, not increasing the length of sanctions lists.

During his visit to China in January, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer agreed to pursue a long-term and consistent comprehensive strategic partnership with China featuring mutual respect, high-level engagement and expanded cooperation in trade, investment, finance and climate. China remains one of UK's largest trading partners, with bilateral trade in goods and services running into tens of billions of pounds annually — supporting jobs, investment and supply chains across the UK. Those are not abstract figures. They reflect complementarity.

Starmer's visit highlighted to the UK the importance of tapping China's stability and growth potential for the UK's economic renewal.
Against that backdrop, the new sanctions look like a reverse swing, something Starmer vowed to avoid before his China trip. Consistency in foreign policy is a prerequisite for credibility. If the UK promises a "long-term and consistent" approach in January but reaches for unilateral arbitrary penalties in March, mutual trust will naturally erode. Investors notice. So do diplomats.

China, for its part, has signaled it will take necessary measures to safeguard the legitimate rights of its enterprises. What would serve both is a sober reassessment in London: Are these sanctions grounded in solid evidence and international legitimacy? Or are they a symbolic gesture designed to demonstrate "toughness" while sidestepping Europe's internal strategic debate?

The UK has historically taken pride in its pragmatic statecraft. In a turbulent world, pragmatism means distinguishing between real security threats and rhetorical constructs. And it means realizing that win-win cooperation — with differences properly managed through dialogue — can be a stabilizing force rather than a vulnerability.

The Starmer government should approach differences through consultation rather than confrontation. It should revoke the unilateral sanctions on Chinese entities. Above all, it should resist the temptation to peddle convenient fallacies about China's "role" in the Ukraine crisis to obscure Europe's own overdue reckoning with its security future. Strategic maturity demands nothing less.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
磐石市| 柘荣县| 西华县| 神农架林区| 黔南| 固原市| 皋兰县| 晴隆县| 雷州市| 龙岩市| 巴林右旗| 赤城县| 乡城县| 泰和县| 朝阳区| 通江县| 通河县| 措美县| 连云港市| 玉门市| 枞阳县| 温宿县| 确山县| 古浪县| 阜南县| 叙永县| 土默特右旗| 嘉义市| 溧阳市| 兴安县| 古交市| 信阳市| 达孜县| 吴江市| 梧州市| 隆尧县| 罗山县| 石泉县| 珲春市| 潼南县| 太保市|