国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Clarification of judicial authorities erases gray area for domestic abuse

By Cao Yin | China Daily | Updated: 2025-12-03 07:54
Share
Share - WeChat
[Photo/VCG]

China is seeing more couples cohabiting before marriage. However, sometimes after entering into a live-in relationship, some individuals are subjected to verbal and/or physical abuse from their partners. In the past, violence in such relationships, fell in a legal "gray area".

For example in one case highlighted by China's top judicial authorities — the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate — a woman surnamed Zhang was frequently insulted, slapped, shoved and whipped with a charging cable by her boyfriend, Wang, after they began living together in March 2022. When Zhang reported the matter to the police in May 2023, Wang argued that it could not be treated as a case of family violence or abuse, as they were just dating.

Under the Criminal Law, mistreating or tormenting a family member, both physically and mentally, through means such as beatings, starvation, forced labor, denial of medical treatment, restriction of freedom, or particularly egregious humiliation constitutes abuse. However, a family member typically refers to those related by marriage, blood or adoption. This limitation restricts many who are in a long-term live-in relationship from seeking legal protection against physical and mental abuse.

To address this concern, the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate unveiled landmark cases around the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women, which falls on Nov 25, demonstrating their firm commitment to punishing the perpetrators of such domestic violence clarifying that when it comes to abuse cohabiting partners are considered family members under the law.

This clarification is vital as recognizing cohabiting partners as members of a family provides stronger legal protection for those facing domestic violence in such a relationship.

In one disclosed case, for instance, after a man surnamed Ma and his girlfriend surnamed Miao began cohabiting in 2021, Ma subjected Miao to prolonged emotional manipulation and psychological control, leading to her suffering a nervous breakdown and ultimately committing suicide in late 2022.

Early this year, Ma was indicted on the charge of abuse and received a prison sentence of three years and two months.

The procuratorate highlighted the case, explaining that, in the context of the crime of abuse, although the couple were not married, they had formed a stable and continuous premarital cohabitation relationship for which they should be treated as "family members".

This ruling is not only indicative of the judiciary's "zero-tolerance" toward domestic abuse, but also eliminates the "gray area" in combating domestic violence.

In other words, victims of mental or physical abuse in live-in relationships will now find it easier to obtain personal safety protection orders from the court as in any other case of domestic violence, while perpetrators will face criminal charges. In severe cases, such as those resulting in death or serious injury, the perpetrator could face up to seven years in prison.

Previously, such perpetrators were usually charged with intentional injury. Although the sentences for intentional injury are generally harsher, typically three years or more, it requires a higher standard of evidence regarding the severity of the injuries, making it difficult to prosecute the perpetrators.

Nowadays intimate relationships between couples outside marriage demand a broader perspective. The latest judicial clarification signals that protection for domestic violence victims extends beyond marriage, emphasizing stronger victim protection.

However, it must be noted that this approach, as yet, applies only to domestic violence cases. In civil matters — such as property allocation and inheritance — cohabitation does not establish family membership.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
南江县| 定西市| 虎林市| 鹰潭市| 乌拉特前旗| 鹤壁市| 土默特右旗| 靖江市| 金塔县| 丰城市| 行唐县| 义马市| 深水埗区| 岑溪市| 丰镇市| 万山特区| 洪泽县| 贺州市| 虹口区| 澄江县| 南陵县| 隆昌县| 阜平县| 湘潭市| 麻栗坡县| 乌拉特中旗| 蓬溪县| 科技| 黑龙江省| 涟源市| 伊吾县| 成安县| 海门市| 齐河县| 南溪县| 略阳县| 珲春市| 灵宝市| 大关县| 宕昌县| 武威市|