国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Berlin's China policy review should aim for objectivity and pragmatism

By LI YANG | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2025-11-11 07:58
Share
Share - WeChat
A view shows containers at a loading terminal in the harbour in Hamburg, Germany, July 13, 2025. [Photo/Agencies]

The German government's plan to reexamine its trade policies toward China through the establishment of a parliamentary expert committee shows its awareness that its China policy needs some changes.

The initiative — which will assess Germany's trade relations with China in areas such as energy, raw material imports and investment in critical infrastructure — is indicative of the broad common interests of the two major economies.

It is hoped that this move will enable the Friedrich Merz government to grasp the cooperative and mutually beneficial nature of Sino-German relations, and lead to a more rational, coherent and pragmatic China policy.

For decades, China and Germany have maintained a strong economic partnership built on mutual respect and shared benefits. From 2016 to 2023, China was Germany's largest trading partner and data from January to August this year show China has overtaken the United States to regain that position. While this underscores that the foundation of Sino-German cooperation remains solid, Berlin's recent policy debates risk undermining that foundation.

The current wave of skepticism toward China in Germany is driven less by genuine economic realities and more by shifting political narratives — particularly those influenced by Washington's tariff war with Beijing, the ongoing Ukraine crisis and the European Union's "de-risking" rhetoric targeting China. While it is natural for Germany to assess its economic risks, such assessment must not be driven by exaggerated concerns or external political pressure.

German Chancellor Merz's recent remarks calling for protectionist measures to defend Europe's steel industry, and Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul's statements about systemic competition with China, signal a worrying departure from Germany's traditional free-trade principles and will only harm the competitive strength of German industries that have long benefited from cooperation with China. Moreover, Wadephul's mischaracterization of China's policies, including some of his irresponsible remarks on the Taiwan question, risks eroding mutual trust and damaging the political atmosphere necessary for sustained cooperation.

China and Germany may differ in their historical experiences, cultures and social systems, but that should not be an obstacle to better trade ties. As Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi emphasized during his recent phone call with Wadephul, at the request of the German side, the key lessons from the development of China-Germany relations are mutual respect, win-win cooperation and partnership positioning. Both sides should enhance communication and dialogue, dispel misunderstandings, and avoid "microphone diplomacy" and groundless accusations.

Wang's message carries an important reminder that China has always supported Germany's reunification and Berlin, having experienced the pain of national division, is expected to understand and support China's efforts to safeguard its sovereignty and territorial integrity. The one-China principle therefore remains the cornerstone of political trust between the two sides.

The new expert committee that it plans to set up is expected to provide the Merz government with more valuable and objective reference on a long-term consistent direction of Germany's China policy. It is advised that Germany should demonstrate its due independence in policymaking, rather than being influenced by external factors.

Berlin should review its China policy with a mindset guided by facts rather than ideology, and cooperation rather than confrontation. That will be conducive to the healthy development of Sino-German relations along a path of mutual respect, mutual benefit and shared progress.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
漠河县| 依安县| 彭泽县| 英德市| 康定县| 深水埗区| 怀安县| 乌审旗| 高碑店市| 乌海市| 西藏| 靖边县| 晴隆县| 灌阳县| 永顺县| 安丘市| 根河市| 会宁县| 简阳市| 孝昌县| 赣榆县| 寻甸| 五华县| 怀远县| 策勒县| 汝城县| 牡丹江市| 集安市| 大方县| 虎林市| 稻城县| 宝应县| 鹤庆县| 灯塔市| 蓬安县| 瑞昌市| 沙雅县| 惠安县| 通海县| 临汾市| 建瓯市|