国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Using clips from other videos for profit an offense

By ZHANG ZHOUXIANG | China Daily | Updated: 2023-10-16 08:42
Share
Share - WeChat
A livestreamer promotes products at the Canon booth during an exhibition in Shanghai in August. [FAN JIANLEI/FOR CHINA DAILY]

"Can you ensure the quality of the watermelon you sell?" This famous quote from actor Sun Honglei's TV series in 2003 has been widely used as a humorous statement or sarcastic rhetoric in videos and online posts. It even figured in a video game operated by two companies, which were sued by Sun for exploiting his image for profit and linking his character to a vile person.

On Friday, the Chengdu Internet Court ruled that the two companies had violated Sun's right to his own voice, by using it to make profit, and therefore should pay him 30,000 yuan ($4,107) as compensation. Many say this is the first ruling of its kind.

The ruling is especially important in this age when everybody can be a "filmmaker". With video-editing software gaining popularity, it has become increasingly convenient for people to make video clips and post them on social media platforms to gain "likes" and followers. Such people are called "vloggers". As a matter of fact, quite a few number of video-makers make profit in this way, indicating "vlogging" is a new profession.

Yet instead of making videos using their own imagination or by focusing on the people and materials available in their surroundings, some "vloggers" are used to "collecting" materials from other videos and "gluing" them together into a product that they label as their own. This might be acceptable if they mean no harm and use the materials only for amusement. But it cannot be acceptable if the "vlogger" makes profit by gluing the "products" that other people have shot and used their imagination and creativity to make.

That's why the Chengdu court ruling is very important. The ruling makes it clear that not even a big company or celebrity can violate someone's right to his own voice or product and make profit. The ruling sets a precedent that those misusing another person's voice or image to make profit have to compensate the aggrieved person.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
门头沟区| 界首市| 武山县| 阜新市| 乌海市| 大宁县| 托克托县| 青冈县| 长子县| 南和县| 景宁| 龙里县| 竹溪县| 喀喇沁旗| 铁岭县| 米脂县| 蒙山县| 宁德市| 沧源| 绵竹市| 将乐县| 景谷| 武汉市| 张家口市| 子洲县| 上虞市| 五家渠市| 仁布县| 建瓯市| 渭南市| 宁德市| 措勤县| 富裕县| 新龙县| 化德县| 炎陵县| 青河县| 福建省| 平乐县| 威宁| 仪征市|