国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Forged certificates call for full vigilance of aircraft industry

By LI YANG | China Daily | Updated: 2023-09-07 08:14
Share
Share - WeChat

Europe's aviation regulator recently exposed some details on an ongoing probe into a British company supplying unsourced engine repair parts, through providing falsified documentation, for the maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) facilities that are also responsible to serve some engine models of Airbus and Boeing aircrafts.

A statement issued by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency said that the London-based AOG Technics sold many aircraft parts with forged authorization certificates and the suppliers who were supposed to supply the parts did not issue relevant certificates.

That all aircraft parts can be traced to source is the norm of the MRO industry. Yet it remains unclear how the falsified documentation had crossed the sea by a trick in such a crucial industry that stresses precision, professionalism and reliability.

EASA has now asked aircraft owners, operators, maintenance organizations and parts dealers to check their records for aircraft parts obtained directly or indirectly from AOG Technics and to replace those.

Engine manufacturers cannot assess the airworthiness of the parts because they do not know about the material, processes and quality controls used to manufacture them.

And at the moment all they can do is to evaluate the validity of the airworthiness documentation that comes with the part to determine if the documentation is authentic. It is good to see they are actively supporting regulators to see into the case to address the root cause of the issue at an early date demonstrating zero-tolerance to any problems that might affect flight safety.

In response to the incident, a spokesperson to CFM International issued a statement to clear the air, which has been found hyped up by some we-media, saying that "We are taking aggressive legal action against AOG Technics to accelerate the industry's ability to identify parts sold by this third-party with falsified documentation."

It is good to see the spokesperson said in the statement that the company remains fully engaged with aviation regulatory authorities to support their investigations into AOG Technics.

And it is to be hoped the aircraft companies can work together with their customers to strengthen their assessment of the authenticity of documentation for parts they acquire directly or indirectly from other parties that have no affiliation with them.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
天津市| 芦山县| 宜昌市| 正阳县| 邻水| 巫山县| 石棉县| 确山县| 宜黄县| 杭锦旗| 崇礼县| 兴海县| 汉寿县| 建昌县| 麟游县| 茶陵县| 鄂托克旗| 彰武县| 姚安县| 南安市| 天峻县| 揭东县| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 上虞市| 陆良县| 庆安县| 马关县| 苏州市| 犍为县| 霍林郭勒市| 元朗区| 蒙阴县| 正宁县| 大安市| 钟山县| 清徐县| 娄底市| 民乐县| 五大连池市| 贞丰县| 高阳县|