国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Some countries' silence on Japan's discharge plan raises eyebrows

China Daily | Updated: 2023-07-12 07:01
Share
Share - WeChat
File photo of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. [Photo/Agencies]

In the days since the International Atomic Energy Agency released its report on the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water from the defunct Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan, much of the international community has expressed fierce opposition to the plan, but many Western countries have kept a studied silence.

After the IAEA report was released, the US State Department issued a statement "welcoming" it. Some Western media outlets pointed out how the Japanese side and the IAEA called it "treated water" instead of "nuclear-contaminated water". A BBC report even inserted a video in which a reporter participated in a "fish-eating performance" to say fish caught near Fukushima was "very safe" and there was nothing to worry about.

Some Western media outlets have tried to be "objective" or "neutral" by quoting various sources, but they deliberately avoid asking key questions, including what are the environmental hazards of the discharge plan, how independent and representative are the samples obtained by the IAEA, and is Japan's assessment of the discharge plan adequate?

Multiple studies have shown that the nuclear-contaminated water from the nuclear plant contains more than 60 radionuclides. Even Japan admits that about 70 percent of the treated nuclear-contaminated water does not meet discharge standards.

A German marine research institute said the radioactive materials will spread across most of the Pacific within 57 days. The radionuclides will be discharged continuously into the sea for 30 years or more, not only damaging the marine ecological environment but also endangering human health and life.

So why are some Western countries so "calm" about it? It is because of their own convoluted past. After all, in the 1940s and 50s, the United States conducted 67 nuclear tests in the Marshall Islands. The US also uses nuclear security as a bargaining chip to win over Japan and make it dependent on the US.

However, the attitude of Western countries cannot help but make people ask: What kind of hypocrisy and double standard makes one keep an eye on developing countries while being selectively blinded to its allies? The Japanese government should heed the just call of all parties and immediately stop the nuclear-contaminated water discharge plan.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
罗定市| 墨脱县| 道孚县| 九龙县| 罗田县| 临江市| 甘谷县| 信阳市| 定襄县| 云阳县| 青田县| 当雄县| 萍乡市| 西吉县| 蒙城县| 平凉市| 枞阳县| 镇原县| 海盐县| 尼玛县| 南通市| 巫山县| 循化| 淄博市| 乌鲁木齐县| 丁青县| 双鸭山市| 泸水县| 托克托县| 荆门市| 南郑县| 垣曲县| 上虞市| 西峡县| 黄平县| 青龙| 清水河县| 上栗县| 鹤峰县| 重庆市| 平利县|