国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Editorials

Bill to promote ideological attack on China not freedom of speech: China Daily editorial

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2022-06-15 20:47
Share
Share - WeChat
[Photo/Sipa]

The so-called China Social Media Reciprocity Act some House Republicans proposed to the United States legislature on Tuesday represents the latest attempt by some US politicians to prevent Sino-US relations from being put back onto the right track.

The act would "prohibit the provision of services by social media platforms to individuals and entities on the Specially Designated Nations List and certain officials and other individuals and entities of the People's Republic of China" unless China verifiably "removes prohibitions on officials of the US government from accessing, using, or participating in social media platforms in China".

The justification given for the move is that banks and US insurance companies are not allowed to provide accounts to sanctioned individuals or entities, but due to the current loophole in the sanctions law, social media companies are allowed to provide the accounts because they are related to freedom of information.

In fact the move is further evidence of the discrimination against anything Chinese that prevails in Washington. As long as Chinese individuals and entities abide by the relevant laws and regulations while using social media platforms run by companies from the US or any other country, they should not be excluded simply because of where they are from, who they work for or what their beliefs are.

Officials of the US are allowed to use Chinese social media platforms so long as they abide by the laws of the country. The US embassy in China has official accounts on Chinese social media platforms as do many senior officials of its allies who welcome the chance to exchange views with Chinese netizens. That US government officials don't is either because they choose not to or because they know what they say would be prohibited under Chinese law.

US social media companies do not appear in China because their internal management rules and the supervisory regulations they follow are not in line with the relevant laws in China. And they have not been willing to adjust them. But the Chinese social media companies, ranging from ByteDance, owner of TikTok, to Tencent, owner of WeChat, are always ready to adapt to the legal environment in the US, in order to enter the US market.

The proposed US act would set a very bad example as it shows that a handful of US lawmakers can easily block the communication between the two peoples.

Although the Joe Biden administration has apparently softened its China rhetoric recently, the proposed act shows that China hawks in Washington are unwilling to let go of their zero-sum mentality.

While there should be guardrails for Sino-US relations, they should not be fences built by the US side with the aim of containing China.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
石棉县| 柏乡县| 诸城市| 贵州省| 莱阳市| 新巴尔虎右旗| 竹山县| 池州市| 综艺| 石棉县| 嵊州市| 峨山| 普宁市| 沁源县| 嵩明县| 克山县| 安宁市| 蛟河市| 渝北区| 顺平县| 泌阳县| 吴旗县| 宁海县| 都江堰市| 绩溪县| 贞丰县| 潞城市| 韶山市| 留坝县| 开原市| 博爱县| 谢通门县| 忻州市| 宜城市| 精河县| 伊春市| 英德市| 定日县| 苗栗市| 忻州市| 洮南市|