国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / Society

An analysis of American interference in Xinjiang affairs under the context of human rights protection - A research report from the perspective of Xinjiang's population

By Zuliyati Simayi and Zhang Yaxi, School of Marxism Xinjiang University | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2021-01-06 15:38
Share
Share - WeChat

Lie No.5: "For 2020, one Uygur region set an unprecedented near-zero population growth target: a mere 1.05 per mille, compared to an already low 11.45 per mille in 2018."

Again, it turns out that Adrian Zenz tampered with the figures of relevant documents released by Kizilsu Kirghiz Autonomous Prefecture to complete his report. As can be seen in the budget report from the Health Commission of Kizilsu Kirghiz Autonomous Prefecture in Chart 2, under the first-level target "Completion target", the natural population growth rate of the second-level target "Quality" is set at 1.05%.

It is worth noting here that the unit used in this document is per cent. In other words, when the unit is converted from per cent to per mille, the natural population growth rate should be 10.5‰. When debunking Lie No.2, we have mentioned the natural population growth rate of Kizilsu Kirghiz Autonomous Prefecture in 2018 is 11.45‰, which means the rate mentioned this document is reduced by only 0.95 per-millage.

Therefore, Adrian Zenz's statement that the natural population growth rate is "a mere 1.05 per mille, compared to an already low 11.45 per mille in 2018" is actually a confusion of measurement unit so as to fabricate lies in his report.

Source: Health Commission of Kizilsu Kirghiz Autonomous Prefecture

From the above "viewpoints" of Adrian Zenz, we can see that in order to make the lies in his report appear authentic, he has adopted such methods as arbitrarily tampering with data, confusing measurement units, using ambiguous concepts and being vague about sources, etc.

Moreover, Adrian Zenz never indicated the name and source of the government documents he mentioned in his report, let alone basic introductions to the reliability and authenticity of the documents. In addition, there is no further elaboration of the relevant documents in the full text, making the sources of his so-called "systematic analysis of government documents" unreliable. We are even wondering whether the data sources were simply made up to support his arguments.

|<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next   >>|
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
东平县| 政和县| 开江县| 石林| 怀安县| 台安县| 射阳县| 永康市| 阜新市| 衡水市| 宜兰市| 山丹县| 广州市| 安吉县| 黄浦区| 都昌县| 宁城县| 陇川县| 浮梁县| 定西市| 驻马店市| 弋阳县| 印江| 平原县| 体育| 炎陵县| 乾安县| 汉源县| 静安区| 宜良县| 大连市| 九龙坡区| 奉贤区| 仪陇县| 大城县| 黄石市| 鄂温| 胶州市| 简阳市| 曲阳县| 滨海县|