国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Europe

Unearthing the truth from the bloodied field

By JULIAN SHEA in London | China Daily Global | Updated: 2020-11-20 09:44
Share
Share - WeChat
The Queen's visit was a deeply symbolic moment. SPORTSFILE/GAA

In the 2016 referendum, Brexit was presented as a black or white issue, and British government minister Liam Fox said a trade agreement with the European Union would be "one of the easiest deals in human history".

Four exhausting, unresolved years later, reality has turned out to be more complex.

As with so much British history, Ireland is a sticking point, so there is great symbolism in the centenary of one of the darkest days in the countries' relationship falling at this time. That day is Bloody Sunday.

To most people, Bloody Sunday means the incident in Northern Ireland in January 1972, where British paratroopers shot dead 14 people. But there was an earlier Bloody Sunday, on Nov 21 1920, at Croke Park stadium in Dublin.

During a British military and police operation at a Gaelic football match, shots were fired, leaving 14 people dead or dying. Its impact has last for generations.

Although British imports soccer and rugby are hugely popular, in Ireland the traditional sports of Gaelic football and hurling enjoy a status far above mere games.

The Gaelic Athletic Association, their governing body, is also a guardian of traditional culture, so much so that until 1971, its constitution banned players from playing sports deemed to be British, and in 2005 rules had to be changed to allow Croke Park to host soccer and rugby.

In 1920 the Irish War of Independence was raging and on the morning of Nov 21, attacks by the Irish Republican Army, the IRA, had killed 14 British intelligence officers.

That afternoon, Dublin were playing Tipperary at Croke Park, and it was suspected that people who had helped the assassins may be in the crowd, so police intended to search spectators inside the ground, with British soldiers remaining outside, according to general historical narration.

What followed went terribly wrong and has been so mythologized that the truth has become largely lost, according to journalist Michael Foley's book and podcast The Bloodied Field, which focus on the victims, as he tries to correct a story that he thinks has been wrongly told and retold for years.

"For years we were fed a black and white narrative, but it's so much more complex," he said. "The British treated the War of Independence as a police war, not a military one, because they didn't want troops to be seen fighting empire subjects.

"The police presence was comprised of the Royal Irish Constabulary, who were regular police, supported by two groups mainly made up of former British soldiers, the Black and Tans, and the Auxiliaries, known for their brutality."

1 2 Next   >>|
Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
昭通市| 文昌市| 阿克陶县| 滨海县| 宿州市| 虎林市| 福安市| 苏尼特右旗| 确山县| 句容市| 鄂伦春自治旗| 兴城市| 凉城县| 疏附县| 盐津县| 化州市| 新余市| 阳泉市| 泾源县| 津市市| 庄河市| 黄大仙区| 德江县| 永定县| 白水县| 清远市| 卓资县| 金沙县| 龙游县| 门源| 商丘市| 翼城县| 新田县| 肥乡县| 南漳县| 门源| 沂源县| 佛坪县| 阿拉善左旗| 紫阳县| 东阳市|