国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Resolving the craftsmanship-wildlife dilemma

China Daily | Updated: 2020-10-21 07:40
Share
Share - WeChat
A diancui model of a kingfisher specimen. [Photo by Yan Dongjie/China Daily]

A video showing a workshop in Suzhou, Jiangsu province, using kingfisher feathers to make ornaments has sparked a controversy online.

Bright blue kingfisher feathers are traditionally used in China to decorate gold or silver plates. The finished jewelry product is bright in color and said to "never fade". However, while the craftsmanship is much in demand, animal rights activists are not too pleased. This underlines the need to adopt a more rational stance toward the issue.

We should respect historical traditions while gradually promoting a change in the way human beings treat wildlife. Commercial use of wildlife should be based on State laws or regulations.

Given that animal protection has a short history even in the West, there are no worldwide universal standards on protecting wildlife.

However, wildlife protection is trending and people are paying more attention to animal resources and their welfare.

Regarding kingfisher feather craftsmanship and the wildlife protection dilemma in China, residents often seek an authoritative, scientific and official answer or expect the relevant authorities to act. However, there is no zero-sum game between cultural heritage and animal protection. The law is the bottom line for resolving this dispute, but it is hard to ask law enforcement agencies to intervene when many kingfisher species are not protected under the law.

A healthy modern society should create room for diverse stances and positions, so that not every decision ends up being reduced to a choice between right and wrong. In the case of the kingfisher feather craftsmanship, the position of the craftsmen engaged in the intangible cultural heritage does not necessarily contradict that of wildlife conservationists. In a pluralistic society, there should be multi-dimensional and multi-layer restrictions on certain "non-progressive" human behaviors. It is through dialogue and dynamic actions that progress is often achieved. Both sides in the kingfisher feather craftsmanship dispute should therefore hold dialogue to resolve their differences.

After all, the public seems tolerant about the use of wildlife in traditional Chinese medicines, although it too contradicts wildlife protection ideas.

If the use of wildlife organs for TCM is considered lawful, shouldn't the use of kingfisher feather craftsmanship in jewelry be allowed? Clearly, it is too early to say which party is right in this debate.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
卫辉市| 从化市| 富平县| 米脂县| 尼勒克县| 南昌市| 蒙阴县| 郯城县| 石城县| 饶河县| 包头市| 行唐县| 尖扎县| 张家界市| 齐河县| 凌海市| 宁晋县| 山丹县| 临朐县| 黔东| 新龙县| 诏安县| 石柱| 宁乡县| 娱乐| 三穗县| 梨树县| 加查县| 青浦区| 玛沁县| 庆云县| 海晏县| 青田县| 绥江县| 武强县| 民县| 宜君县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 吕梁市| 宣恩县| 内江市|