国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Residents raise voice against 'overcharging' for parcel lockers

By Wang Yiqing | China Daily | Updated: 2020-05-13 07:30
Share
Share - WeChat
A resident collects her express parcels from a Hive Box self-serve package locker at a residential complex in Beijing on Feb 12. KUANG YANTAO/FOR CHINA DAILY

An open letter from Zhong Huan Garden, a residential community in Shanghai, on Sunday urging Hive Box to adjust its "unreasonable" charging policy for package lockers has gone viral online.

Hive Box, which provides temporary storage of express delivery packages, has invited public criticism in recent days for "overcharging" service users. The company announced recently that beginning in May, it will charge for delivery packages that remain stored in its express lockers for more than 12 hours. The public discontent is not because the company is charging for its services, but because it is overcharging.

Such lockers save an express deliveryman's time, as they can drop parcels into these lockers instead of going all the way to the recipients' doorsteps. Hive Box has been charging deliverymen for this efficient service for some time now. But the consumers, who would prefer the goods to be delivered at their doorstep, are loathe to use the locker service and, worse, even pay for it.

The Provisional Regulations for Express Delivery in China stipulates that recipients have the right to examine and receive their packages in person. The regulation on express locker service, effective since Oct 1, stipulates that deliverymen should seek the recipients' permission before dropping their parcels into the lockers.

Irked by Hive Box's overcharging policy, many resident communities have decided to stop using the service. Dongxinyuan residential community in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, informed Hive Box about its decision to not use its lockers unless it stops "illegally charging" them. They also sent a copy of their letter to the Hangzhou Consumers Association.

The letter from Zhong Huan Garden owners committee challenges the logic behind Hive Box's overcharging policy, be it from the perspective of consumers' rights, market rules or cost-benefit analysis.

On Tuesday, the committee also appealed to the authorities to launch an investigation against Hive Box for abusing its dominant market position.

The dispute over Hive Box's charges is a perfect example of consumers safeguarding their legal rights through public discussion and legal means. It is now up to the relevant authorities to investigate and safeguard consumers' rights.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
从江县| 修文县| 临洮县| 朝阳县| 汤原县| 金寨县| 东阳市| 大连市| 无极县| 清涧县| 九龙坡区| 叙永县| 新化县| 贵溪市| 长海县| 宽城| 平塘县| 莱芜市| 河东区| 平武县| 常州市| 安西县| 罗山县| 赤城县| 伊川县| 馆陶县| 微山县| 昌吉市| 东阳市| 吴堡县| 丹东市| 南溪县| 霸州市| 上林县| 碌曲县| 潜山县| 四川省| 深泽县| 余姚市| 青神县| 乌兰县|