国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Violent protests are clearly not 'non-cooperation movement’

By Kam Lam-yuen | China Daily Asia | Updated: 2019-08-12 15:44
Share
Share - WeChat
Protesters try to obstruct train doors from closing and abuse emergency buttons on platforms to disrupt the normal MTR operation. Photo by China Daily

The MTR Corp issued a notice last Tuesday morning about receiving numerous reports of protesters obstructing train doors from closing and abusing emergency buttons on platforms. This brought much inconvenience to commuters due to disruption of train services. In particular, services along the Island line and Kwun Tong line, which runs across the city’s important industrial and commercial districts, were temporarily suspended. In recent weeks, radical protesters have repeatedly disrupted the operation of elevators in public buildings and obstructed MTR train doors from closing in what they called a “non-cooperation movement”. Such unlawful actions that seriously affect the daily lives of citizens must be severely condemned.

The so-called “non-cooperation movement”, originated from Mahatma Gandhi’s approach to combat Britain’s unjust colonial rule in India, is a non-violent campaign against an unjust political regime. It is preposterous that Hong Kong protesters call their destructive actions a non-cooperation movement. To start with, what the radicals have been doing since last month are mostly violent acts that have contravened the law and destabilized society — which goes totally against the spirit of a non-cooperation movement. Secondly, Gandhi’s resistance movement was launched because the country was unjustly ruled and exploited by a colonial power with many citizens living in poverty. As an Indian who suffered discrimination and humiliation in his own country, Gandhi was compelled to rally all Indians behind his non-cooperation campaign in order to fight British colonial rule. In contrast, the participants of Hong Kong’s so-called non-cooperation campaign relentlessly disrupted the daily lives of citizens.

The radicals self-righteously and wantonly indulged in acts that disrupted the normal lives of citizens, against the public interests. Non-cooperation movements in the past were aimed at boycotting foreign products, promoting local industries and national education. In contrast, Hong Kong’s radical protesters are sabotaging the city’s stability and prosperity in collusion with external anti-China forces — under the pretext of opposing proposed amendments to the extradition laws. Their ill intentions are appalling.

China-bashers in the West claim that democracy in Hong Kong is being undermined. They are lying through their teeth. Under British rule, the governor was directly appointed by the British monarch, and many positions in the British Hong Kong government were held by British people. Since Hong Kong’s return to China, the central government has, in accordance with the Constitution and the Basic Law, implemented the principles of “one country, two systems” and “Hong Kong people governing Hong Kong” to ensure a high degree of autonomy for the HKSAR, so Hong Kong residents now enjoy unprecedented civil rights and freedom — a fact that is obvious to all. The truth stands the test of time. The radicals would better bear Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying’s remarks at mind: “Hong Kong is part of China; the Chinese government will not tolerate any foreign intervention in Hong Kong’s affairs, nor will it allow any external forces to destabilize Hong Kong.” Those involved in these protests should brush up on history. They would then realize that no traitor escapes unscathed after hurting the nation and its people.

The author is a current affairs commentator and a member of Hua Jing Society. This is an excerpt translation of his Chinese article published earlier in Hong Kong Commercial Daily.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
古蔺县| 吉木萨尔县| 昌吉市| 清水河县| 湖北省| 武冈市| 双峰县| 岳阳市| 山东省| 柳林县| 崇礼县| 承德县| 康乐县| 谷城县| 乌拉特中旗| 宝鸡市| 淄博市| 峨山| 璧山县| 克东县| 永宁县| 昌乐县| 司法| 唐河县| 柏乡县| 双牌县| 文安县| 松滋市| 湾仔区| 乐平市| 宕昌县| 鄂托克前旗| 龙州县| 清苑县| 淮阳县| 宝鸡市| 额济纳旗| 桓台县| 彭州市| 都兰县| 友谊县|