国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

There should be a bottom line for forecast variance

China Daily | Updated: 2019-04-25 08:28
Share
Share - WeChat

Editor's note: Recently, some domestic listed companies significantly lowered their performance forecasts, sending shockwaves through the stock market and causing investors to panic. Xiong Jinqiu, a finance commentator, told Beijing News. Excerpts:

On April 18, Western Mining Co., Ltd, a listed company in Northwest China engaged in the mining, smelting and trading of metal minerals, released a revised performance forecast announcement, saying its net profit in 2018 dropped by 2.54 billion yuan ($397 million), compared with its previously-forecast net profit decrease of 160 million yuan, mainly due to a 2.52 billion yuan long-term equity investment loss.

The Shanghai Stock Exchange has a clear regulation on the disclosure of a listed company's earnings forecast and corrections, stipulating that a listed company must make public its performance forecast should its annual net profit increase or decrease by more than 50 percent, and under other specific scenarios. And if there is much difference between the forecast performance and actual performance, a prompt performance correction announcement should be published.

That there will be some deviations between the actual and predicted performance is to be expected. But it is difficult to understand a huge divergence between a company's prediction and actual performance such as that revealed by Western Mining, especially when there are no signs forewarning there will be such a variance.

How can the authorities make regulations to prevent such forecasts from damaging the interests of investors? Targeting those companies that make much-deviated performance forecasts, what the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges both do is to urge their board of directors to learn lessons, make timely rectifications and prevent similar scenarios happening again. Such regulatory measures obviously lack any deterrence force and are unable to effectively curb the frequent occurrence of deviations between the forecast and actual performance.

In order to encourage predictive information disclosure, the US Securities and Exchange Commission adopted regulations in 1979 that exempt companies making such kind of information disclosures from fraud liability. In 1995, it also passed a Securities Law that stipulated such information disclosures should include advance warnings, timely upgrades and credibility. And should there be much deviation from the forecast that results in losses, investors can file a lawsuit against the company and ask for compensation.

For listed companies in the A-share stock market whose information disclosure errors cause huge losses to investors, the Chinese regulator should verify whether there are false statements, and give severe punishments to those who deliberately make false statements, even hold them criminally accountable.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
固安县| 卢龙县| 林西县| 新疆| 安康市| 海晏县| 咸阳市| 吴川市| 桐城市| 石景山区| 化隆| 思南县| 萍乡市| 元朗区| 合山市| 阿拉善右旗| 宁安市| 石泉县| 巢湖市| 旬阳县| 安庆市| 迭部县| 六安市| 丹凤县| 寿光市| 合水县| 长丰县| 永善县| 杭锦后旗| 揭西县| 津南区| 新余市| 泸西县| 密山市| 宜章县| 高台县| 朝阳县| 南康市| 荔浦县| 南华县| 芷江|