国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

It's theft, not misuse of big data technology

By Zhou Xin | China Daily | Updated: 2019-03-29 07:57
Share
Share - WeChat
[Ma Xuejing/China Daily]

QIAODA GROUP, a Beijing-based human resources company which claims to have the largest curriculum vitae database in China, has been reportedly selling the CVs illegally to headhunters and other companies. Zhou Xin, an associate researcher at the Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, comments:

In its previous commercial plan, Qiaoda said it had information on more than 220 million CVs, and the address books stored on about 1 billion people's smartphones. And, according to reports, in 2017 the company earned 411 million yuan ($61 million) in revenue by "sharing" data with other companies-that is, by selling them.

This, if true, means Qiaoda has misused the personal information and violated the privacy of many people. Perhaps that's why police detained the whole Qiaoda team in mid-March, according to media reports, and the company's senior executives are still under detention.

Although some reports say Qiaoda used big data technology to steal personal information, the key point here is not technology.

Qiaoda got the personal information from the CVs by co-working with other employment websites and the address books of smartphone users by collaborating with third-party smartphone apps. Then it used algorithms to match the two sets of information to build a database that companies would pay to get.

This entire process hardly demands the use of big data technology. And a programmer with even a little experience can match the CVs with the address books.

So those demanding stricter control on the use of big data technology have missed the point, for the violation of privacy in this case has nothing to do with the abuse of big data technology. Instead, the employment websites and smartphone apps should be better regulated so they cannot share people's personal information with Qiaoda and other companies. And Qiaoda should be held accountable for its misdeeds to deter other companies from following in its footsteps.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
沽源县| 上虞市| 双鸭山市| 武胜县| 灵川县| 都昌县| 万荣县| 双柏县| 乐平市| 玛纳斯县| 龙州县| 梅河口市| 临夏县| 应城市| 巨鹿县| 炎陵县| 孟连| 大余县| 石屏县| 锦州市| 海南省| 棋牌| 肥城市| 米脂县| 铁岭市| 灵宝市| 布拖县| 斗六市| 滁州市| 湘潭市| 昌宁县| 麦盖提县| 徐汇区| 三明市| 辰溪县| 腾冲县| 长白| 阳高县| 武义县| 靖安县| 高唐县|