国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Chinese researchers must adopt a more long-term perspective

China Daily | Updated: 2018-10-12 07:36
Share
Share - WeChat
The Nobel Prize laureates for Medicine or Physiology 2018, James P. Allison, US and Tasuku Honjo, Japan for their achievements in cancer treatment are presented at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden October 1, 2018. [Photo/Agencies]

Japan's Tasuku Honjo, a professor of immunology of Kyoto University, won the 2018 Nobel Prize in medicine, together with the James Allison, a professor of immunology with the University of Texas of the United States, for their research that has revolutionized the treatment of cancer last week. Xinhua News Agency comments:

Japanese scientists have brought home 18 Nobel Prizes over the past 18 years, during which their Chinese counterparts have secured only one-pharmaceutical chemist Tu Youyou, won the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2015 for her groundbreaking work on malaria in the 1960s.

Undoubtedly, China can learn a lot from Japan on how to strengthen its scientific research. Long-term stable support for fundamental research, a strong crisis awareness, and paying great attention to cultivating young scientists and researchers are the three pillars of Japan's scientific research success.

Surveys on Nobel laureates in science and economics since the 1940s have shown that the average time interval between their winning of the prize and their prize-winning discovery is 26 years. In other words, few Nobel laureates had really thought about the honor when they began the research that led to their key discoveries. Their work was driven by their curiosity and academic interest.

However, many Chinese scientists are eager for quick success and instant benefits, and their research is mostly oriented toward obtaining government funds or quick industrialization. Few are willing to dedicate years to difficult fundamental research that may not result in any concrete findings.

Also the research assessment system in China is focused on the number of papers researchers publish, not the quality of their work. And the number of theses published in China and the increase of China's input into research in recent years have dwarfed many other countries, including Japan.

The white paper books on science and technology published by the Japanese government each year, meanwhile, indicate the number of papers published by Japanese scientists has declined slightly since 2004, and the Japanese government's input into research and development only increased 15 percent from 2000 to 2018.

China needs to attach more importance to the quality of it research, providing more incentives to encourage fundamental research and further improve the efficiency of its input in research and development.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
蓬安县| 建湖县| 灵璧县| 蓝山县| 阳东县| 金乡县| 宁津县| 汤原县| 平谷区| 民乐县| 梧州市| 桦甸市| 黄大仙区| 昭通市| 汕头市| 农安县| 门头沟区| 隆昌县| 建平县| 平罗县| 大余县| 阿克| 当阳市| 怀安县| 石棉县| 慈溪市| 奎屯市| 丰城市| 临潭县| 讷河市| 潼南县| 呼和浩特市| 拜泉县| 东方市| 白城市| 兴文县| 历史| 东宁县| 岳阳县| 剑河县| 长岭县|