国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Fishy standards may pose risk to 'salmon' eaters

China Daily | Updated: 2018-08-14 07:12
Share
Share - WeChat
Ireneo Balinbin, a fish processor in Alaska, filets the first Copper River King Salmon of the season in 2016, after it arrived on the first cargo shipment of the fish this season from Cordova to Seattle. [Photo/Agencies]

In collaboration with enterprises, the China Aquatic Products Processing and Marketing Alliance recently drafted a new standard that categorizes rainbow trout as salmon. Beijing News comments:

Salmon, as purchased by consumers, generally refers to Atlantic salmon, and not the so-called freshwater salmon, rainbow trout, which are a different genus.

But for a long time, many restaurants and shops have served the latter when customers order salmon. If customers cannot tell the difference, they will say that rainbow trout are salmon too.

While they are of the same family, the restaurants' explanation is not only specious, but also poses a risk to human health. The raw meat of true salmon can be served after strict freezing processes that kill the parasites inside. Yet no medical professional will dare propose eating the raw meat of rainbow trout, which might contain parasites that are difficult to kill without proper cooking. Strictly speaking, medical professionals advise never eating the raw meat of any kind of freshwater fish because only cooking can kill the parasites inside their bodies.

That's why many medical professionals and biologists have criticized restaurants for serving rainbow trout as salmon and have called for the practice to be banned.

As a result, there are doubts about the newly released standards. By classifying rainbow trout as salmon, the alliance is encouraging restaurants to continue in their customary way. Customers will need to spend more time and energy learning to distinguish "true salmon" from rainbow trout, while restaurants will have to make efforts to convince consumers that they are serving "true salmon" not rainbow trout. Only the enterprises that sell rainbow trout will benefit because they can continue claiming they sell "freshwater salmon".

According to the law, the standard released by the enterprises and their alliance is only a nonmandatory group standard. Every consumer has the right to refuse it. So next time if you go to a restaurant, order "salmon" and get a dish of rainbow trout instead, you can complain.

A more serious problem is that, the new standard requires rainbow trout businesses to label the sources of their products and terminate all parasites inside, but some enterprises might neglect to do this. The food authorities should intervene to prevent that from happening.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
无为县| 和林格尔县| 隆林| 克东县| 丰城市| 海门市| 淳安县| 开化县| 梨树县| 合肥市| 安溪县| 余姚市| 东港市| 阳原县| 台南县| 格尔木市| 融水| 永福县| 淅川县| 乌海市| 同仁县| 竹溪县| 阿拉善左旗| 伊宁县| 璧山县| 满洲里市| 榕江县| 即墨市| 疏附县| 北流市| 柳河县| 射洪县| 闸北区| 青神县| 武乡县| 东源县| 健康| 宁国市| 陇南市| 海盐县| 常宁市|