国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Debate touches on economic pain point

China Daily | Updated: 2018-07-24 07:51
Share
Share - WeChat
A clerk counts cash at a bank in Huaibei, Anhui province. [Photo provided to China Daily]

THE PUBLIC DEBATE between two senior researchers, one with the People's Bank of China and the other with the Ministry of Finance, has laid bare how delicate the balance is between money supply and tax reduction. Beijing News comments:

This is actually an academic debate, which has caused a strong social repercussion because the current economy is facing the impact of external uncertainty. When such uncertainty and the domestic financial deleverage "meet", it is a matter of course to reflect on past monetary and fiscal policies.
The argument itself is not important. What is important is that the current debate has touched on the economic pain point.

With the financial deleveraging and the volatility of the stock market, bond market and foreign exchange market, the market wanted a loose monetary policy.

However, a loose monetary policy will lead to the flow of funds into the real estate market and encourage inefficient companies to continue to borrow.

It is not difficult to know that under the pressure of the economic downturn, enterprises are more sensitive to the burden of tax. Therefore, behind the perspective of the debate, we should pay attention to the expectations of enterprises for tax reduction and fee cutting policies. Only in this way can we better implement the innovation-driven strategy, encourage innovation, reduce the costs for the real economy, and optimize the business environment.

Monetary policy and fiscal policy complement each other, and the argument shows both sides have lessons to learn.

The debate has touched a pain spot of the Chinese economy. The authorities must constrain their impulse to print money, as experience shows the excessive liquidity mainly inflates the real property bubble, and they should ease the real economy's operating costs with tax cuts.

If enterprises, as the targets of the policies, do not find it easier to obtain financing or find their burden eased through promised tax cuts, the policies not only fail, but more importantly might guide resources in the wrong direction.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
牡丹江市| 晋中市| 东明县| 固始县| 通城县| 望奎县| 绥棱县| 靖州| 德昌县| 井研县| 邹平县| 铁岭市| 伊吾县| 漯河市| 娱乐| 锦屏县| 宁海县| 贡嘎县| 上虞市| 白河县| 鸡东县| 简阳市| 调兵山市| 贵定县| 杭锦旗| 仁化县| 涿州市| 东平县| 延川县| 呼伦贝尔市| 深州市| 赣州市| 蓬溪县| 布尔津县| 苍南县| 始兴县| 志丹县| 运城市| 邵武市| 岳阳县| 沐川县|