国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

GDP alone can't measure quality growth

By Li Yiping | China Daily | Updated: 2018-01-29 07:39
Share
Share - WeChat
Photo: VCG

High-quality economic growth is an important element of "Xi Jinping Thought on Socialist Economy with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era". As socialism with Chinese characteristics has stepped into a new era, so has China's economic development, transitioning from high-speed growth to high-quality growth, which in turn will lead to a series of drastic changes including those in the development model and evaluation index.

It is important to remember that there is a difference between economic development and economic growth. The latter refers simply to GDP growth, while the former means all-round economic growth, development and improvement. High-quality economic development thus includes higher product quality and industrial level, and better industrial distribution and product structure.

Scientific, effective and reasonable resource distribution is necessary to build a modern industrial structure and harmonious society, and to make economic development balanced enough to meet "people's ever-growing needs for a better life". In this sense, high-quality development refers to comprehensive improvement in economic, social and natural parameters. High-quality development based on total factor productivity and innovation is what sustainability all about.

But high-quality development cannot be measured by GDP growth alone. In some cases, pursuing fast-paced GPD growth, the core indicator of economic growth, could be detrimental to quality economic development. Gross domestic product is an absolute economic quantity concept, first developed by US economist Simon Kuznets in 1934. It is a monetary measure of all final goods and services of a country in a given period (quarterly or yearly) of time. It is especially applicable to economies such as the United States, where all the products are included in transactions.

With the rising polarization between the rich and poor, and worsening environmental pollution, more and more people want a different criterion to be used to measure social and economic development. And some economists have proposed criteria such as "happiness index" and "human development index" as an alternative.

GDP has many shortcomings in terms of evaluating economic development. For instance, it ignores the importance of self-sufficiency. If one woman is employed by a man to do housework, GDP will increase accordingly. But if the man marries a woman and she does the same work as the housemaid, albeit without getting paid for it, GDP will reduce. Take another example. Sales of air purifiers increase when air pollution levels are very high, which increases GDP but not necessarily people's welfare. Or, when a serious road accident damages a car beyond repair, and its owner, who is seriously injured, decides to buy a new car, GDP will increase, even though the car owner will suffer a loss.

GDP also hides the debt situation, as a region with high GDP may be supported by high debts, which actually carry tremendous financial risks. As such, traditional growth models that yield rapid economic growth may also cause unbalanced, inadequate development, which can hardly satisfy people's high-end demands. And if GDP is considered the main criterion for evaluating officials' political performance, the officials are quite likely to fudge the GDP figures.

Fast-paced, high-volume GDP growth has made China the second-largest economy, but it has also created a lot of problems, including high environmental pollution, serious structural headaches and financial risks. All these suggest GDP should not be used as the main index to evaluate quality economic development.

China's economic development has entered a new era. The transition from high-speed growth to high-quality growth is a difficult but historic process. And global experiences show achieving high-quality development is much more difficult than high-speed growth.

Therefore, we should first make more efforts to accelerate the transition process and be prudent about economic stimulation. Second, we need to intensify research to determine the best indicator for high-quality development according to the five development principles contained in "Xi Jinping Thought on Socialist Economy with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era". And third, we have to create an innovation-friendly environment, in order to improve the quality of economic development.

The author is a professor of economics at Renmin University of China.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
商城县| 扶沟县| 夏邑县| 土默特左旗| 老河口市| 荣成市| 霍林郭勒市| 喀喇| 双峰县| 太仆寺旗| 绥滨县| 察雅县| 广水市| 阳高县| 屯昌县| 武乡县| 天等县| 出国| 沙洋县| 金平| 平和县| 乡城县| 宁波市| 揭西县| 甘孜| 盐城市| 湄潭县| 关岭| 庆云县| 江安县| 马边| 正蓝旗| 抚州市| 阆中市| 区。| 新绛县| 海林市| 邹平县| 武冈市| 会泽县| 泾阳县|