国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Draft on govt info disclosure too vague

China Daily | Updated: 2017-06-20 07:48
Share
Share - WeChat

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang speaks at the Central Urban Work Conference in Beijing, Dec 22, 2015.[Photo/Xinhua]

A DRAFT AMENDMENT to the 2008 regulation on government information disclosure has been issued by the State Council, China's Cabinet, to solicit public opinions. Southern Metropolis Daily commented on Monday:

It is praiseworthy that the draft does not shun questions over the increasing public calls for government information and the obligation of government organs to disclose it.

The constant disclosure "tussle" between people who want to know more about local governance and civil servants wary of divulging sensitive information has, in fact, found expression in the making and revision of relevant legal codes.

That explains why the latest draft reiterates the principle that government information disclosure should be the norm and nondisclosure exceptional. For that to have teeth, legislative revisions are needed to clarify what is eligible for disclosure and what is not.

There should be little controversy over the information subject to specially designed laws and regulations that is not to be made public under any circumstances. On the other hand, government information that risks "endangering national security, economic security, and social stability", yet can be disclosed in the appropriate circumstances, is often inaccessible.

The draft amendment is right to clarify that the disclosure, if deemed by same-level local governments as a potential threat to public security and social stability or the implementation of key financial policies, will not have to be made.

The vague wording and the lack of concrete criteria, however, may leave room for government departments not to make public information that they should. What constitutes potential security threats and the same-level governments' authority in deciding what to disclose, is not set out clearly enough to convince people that the right to withhold critical information is not being abused. Public supervision of government may be kept at bay in this way.

Making public government information is now a step that cannot be taken back. The disclosure of government information may be better decided by the top legislative body, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, rather than the governments themselves.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
明光市| 四子王旗| 吐鲁番市| 宝鸡市| 于田县| 杂多县| 墨竹工卡县| 抚宁县| 玛曲县| 夏邑县| 义乌市| 格尔木市| 湟中县| 濮阳县| 怀安县| 武胜县| 大田县| 甘泉县| 济南市| 河西区| 桂阳县| 富川| 黄梅县| 黔西| 老河口市| 隆化县| 宣恩县| 积石山| 定南县| 习水县| 阳原县| 桓台县| 福泉市| 南宫市| 潜山县| 全州县| 商洛市| 昌黎县| 浦江县| 襄樊市| 綦江县|